On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:17:18PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
> > af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
>
> Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix, but the word "expe
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
>> af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
>
> Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix, but the word "experimented" do
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
> af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
Yes, it wasn't really a typo fix, but the word "experimented" doesn't
really make sense to me in this context. What would you sugges
Hi Patrick,
I disagree most vehemently with your "fix" in
af68a98e6c142e3479498b49ae924919efa94c77
Yours cordially,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1983047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1983047
On 8/19/10 7:52 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
> 2010/8/19 Mike Solomon
>> This makes me wonder...if one creates a grob from the scheme-end, is there a
>> way that it can get in on the pure-print-callback action? Currently, the
>> list is not defined publi
2010/8/19 Mike Solomon
> This makes me wonder...if one creates a grob from the scheme-end, is
> there a way that it can get in on the pure-print-callback action?
> Currently, the list is not defined publicly. A simple define-public should
> do the trick, but I’m not sure...thoughts?
>
Not cur
This makes me wonder...if one creates a grob from the scheme-end, is there a
way that it can get in on the pure-print-callback action? Currently, the
list is not defined publicly. A simple define-public should do the trick,
but I’m not sure...thoughts?
~Mike
On 8/19/10 3:28 PM, "Joe Neeman" wr
On 19 August 2010 21:30, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> This example does not look as good as it did on 2.12 - the layout is
> much tighter, with 10 systems on the first page, as opposed to 8 under
> 2.12 - not sure it's an actual bug, though? Using 2.13.30 I get no
> errors with the compilation.
Aah, s
On 19 August 2010 21:28, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. You can fix it by adding
> ly:sustain-pedal::print to the list of pure-print-callbacks in
> scm/define-grobs.scm at line 2438. I'll push this to git in a minute,
> so it will be in the next release.
Great news!
Fast fix,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Hi Joe!
>
> A recent message from 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng pointed out that the Dynamics
> context do not seem to be well handled by the page breaking system.
> It causes the "couldn't fit music on page" warning and the systems are
> "piled up" i
[This is another BUG, although the message is quite...
similar! ;-D]
Hi Joe!
A recent message from 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng pointed out that the changing
staff manually (\change Staff = staffName) do not seem to be well
handled by the page breaking system.
It causes the "couldn't fit music on page" wa
Hi Joe!
A recent message from 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng pointed out that the Dynamics
context do not seem to be well handled by the page breaking system.
It causes the "couldn't fit music on page" warning and the systems are
"piled up" in the first page.
As a minimal example I just took the "Piano cente
LGTM. Yes, it's ugly, but it's readable ugly.
Thanks!
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/2016041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:43 PM
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
BTW, there are several snippets in the LSR which would be good
to incorporate but which are not tagged with docs. It's a real
pain
for me to do this
Yes; any LSR editor can ad
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> BTW, there are several snippets in the LSR which would be good
> to incorporate but which are not tagged with docs. It's a real pain
> for me to do this - as far as I can see I have to effectively copy the
> entire snippet and reenter it
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, August 17, 2010 1:23 PM
Valentin:
I've just pushed a patch which sets out NR 2.1 the way I want it
to
be. We can now begin work on fleshing out all the missing bits.
To avoid merge conflicts we shall need to avoid changing the
same parts of vocal.itely simultan
All changes implemented save ly:make-event-class, which I wouldn't want to
touch in this issue as it is a public function and thus may cause renaming
issues in both the repository and people's scores. I wouldn't mind opening
a separate issue for it, but I'm not sure how one goes about registering
18 matches
Mail list logo
