On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:01:06PM +0200, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> some time ago there has been some discussion about a way to run LilyPond
> once and keep it running, waiting for a filename to compile. I think it
> was a special .ly file containing Scheme code that was started and ran all
> the
On 5 August 2010 20:24, David Kastrup wrote:
> That could be considered slightly unintuitive since the bellows changes
> direction at a time less than or equal to note onset. Nothing that
> would worry me all too much.
You could work round this via music functions (which would give the
impressi
Neil Puttock writes:
> On 5 August 2010 19:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> now that we have accordion push&pull symbols in Lilypond, I want to
>> use them. Tracking things up and down other articulation code I
>> found that its not possible to make the accordion symbols regular
>> articulations (
Op Do, 5 augustus, 2010 13:01, I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago there has been some discussion about a way to run LilyPond
> once and keep it running, waiting for a filename to compile. I think it
> was a special .ly file containing Scheme code that was started and ran all
> the init stuff, then wa
On 5 August 2010 19:20, David Kastrup wrote:
> now that we have accordion push&pull symbols in Lilypond, I want to use
> them. Tracking things up and down other articulation code I found that
> its not possible to make the accordion symbols regular articulations
> (the script engraver will only
Hi,
now that we have accordion push&pull symbols in Lilypond, I want to use
them. Tracking things up and down other articulation code I found that
its not possible to make the accordion symbols regular articulations
(the script engraver will only work with symbols named "scripts.*").
However, it
On 5 August 2010 13:04, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Sorry for the slew of patches in this vein - as I run into problems while
> trying to create a real engraver in scheme, I'm sending these patches along.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1878048
What's wrong with using ly:context-property?
If you nee
Hi,
some time ago there has been some discussion about a way to run LilyPond
once and keep it running, waiting for a filename to compile. I think it
was a special .ly file containing Scheme code that was started and ran all
the init stuff, then waited for the name of a .ly file to process (via a
s
Sorry for the slew of patches in this vein - as I run into problems while
trying to create a real engraver in scheme, I'm sending these patches along.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1878048
Cheers,
~Mike
0002-Adds-ly-engraver-property-to-engraver-scheme.patch
Description: Binary data
__
Hi all,
An Updated patch set is available for review.
It's undergone a regression test run here.
Sorry for the whitespace noise - git-cl upload doesn't have a -b option
like git format-patch.
Cheers,
Ian
http://www.codereview.appspot.com/1160044/show
_
Hey lilyponders,
I was able to create a spanner that has more or less the same
functionality as TextSpanner entirely out of scheme in a ".ly" file. I used
the newly-christened ly:announce-end-grob as well as ly:grob-chain-callback
and ly:engraver-property, both of which I've uploaded to Reitve
11 matches
Mail list logo
