I'll be on vacation this week; probably away from the internet for the
entire week.
I'll respond as soon as possible to any issues when I return.
If there are any issues with the autobeaming code that breaks compiling,
please revert the patch if it can't be fixed.
I'll check email once more tomo
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/18/10 3:11 PM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
>>Op zondag 18-07-2010 om 13:35 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
>> McCarty:
>>> I think if we "roll our own" LilyPad, and borrow a lot of ideas from
>>> gummi or other similar projects, we
Carl, just wanted to echo Trevor's appreciation for your work. Thanks. :)
Jon
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/18/10 12:33 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>> Carl,
>>
>> Just to congratulate you on finally succeeding with this.
>> This will be a great improvement in th
On 7/18/10 3:11 PM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
> Op zondag 18-07-2010 om 13:35 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
> McCarty:
> Hi Patrick,
>
>> Yeah, I'm getting a little carried away. :)
>
> Been there, see below :-)
>
>>>http://gummi.midnightcoding.org/
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>> I got it r
On 7/18/10 12:33 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> Carl,
>
> Just to congratulate you on finally succeeding with this.
> This will be a great improvement in the next release.
Thanks, Trevor. It's been fun, but I'm ready to be done with it.
Next step, Issue # 11.
Carl
__
Op zondag 18-07-2010 om 13:35 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
McCarty:
Hi Patrick,
> Yeah, I'm getting a little carried away. :)
Been there, see below :-)
> >http://gummi.midnightcoding.org/
>
> Cool!
>
> I got it running on my Linux box, and it looks promising.
Talking about carri
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/18/10 2:56 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
>
>> It could be smart to work together with gummi,
>> possibly there are better programs than gummi,
>> possibly we're better off stealing their technology
>> (poppler pdf display) and rolling
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
>
> While I appreciate your working on lilypad, I doubt
> whether this is an efficient way of spending our efforts.
Yeah, I'm getting a little carried away. :)
I'm starting to think it would be difficult expanding on the curren
Carl,
Just to congratulate you on finally succeeding with this.
This will be a great improvement in the next release.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
To: "Lily devel"
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 5:39 AM
Subject: Autobeaming code pushed -- need to run make bin-clean
the big difference came out of the notes.clean() (???) line!
yours, Arno
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:02:07 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
On 7/18/10 2:56 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
> It could be smart to work together with gummi,
> possibly there are better programs than gummi,
> possibly we're better off stealing their technology
> (poppler pdf display) and rolling our own.
>
> What do you think?
One good thing about doing t
On 7/18/10 1:17 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Writing `/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/Documentation/out/pitches.texi'...
> Processing include: rhythms.itely
> Reading /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/Documentation/out/rhythms.itely...
> Dissecting...lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: subdividing-beams.ly
On 2010/07/18 09:08:19, Valentin Villenave wrote:
if you don't mind me asking, where are we wrt this patch?
If it only comes down to a coding style problem, I'm pretty sure I've
already
seen worse in existing source code :)
I've prepared a patch which I'll push later.
Cheers,
Neil
http:
On 2010/07/11 04:08:30, Carl wrote:
If we get these cleared up, then I'll push.
Hello guys,
if you don't mind me asking, where are we wrt this patch?
If it only comes down to a coding style problem, I'm pretty sure I've
already seen worse in existing source code :)
Cheers,
Valentin
http://c
Hi Patrick,
While I appreciate your working on lilypad, I doubt
whether this is an efficient way of spending our efforts.
Why not write a simple editor in pygtk? Indeed, I wanted
to write a simple editor to get you going and found gummi:
http://gummi.midnightcoding.org/
it took me about 1
Carl Sorensen writes:
> I have pushed the new autobeaming code to master.
>
> The build will fail due to old .o files that have been removed.
>
> You will need to do
>
> make bin-clean
>
> or
>
> rm lily/out/*
>
> before compiling.
Processing include: pitches.itely
Reading /usr/local/tmp/lilypon
16 matches
Mail list logo
