Oh, I forgot to mention that a new version of the patch has been posted
for review.
THanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1667044/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2010/06/16 23:31:23, Neil Puttock wrote:
Carl, have you looked at the regtest output?
Yes, but I made a mistake when I did so. I've now got the regtest
output all working right
except for one beam in measure 5 of slur-scoring.ly.
In the baseline, notes 2/8, 3/8, and 4/8 are all beamed toge
Hey y'alls,
I'm trying to solve the age-old [for me] problem of MetronomeMark placement.
There are [at least] four issues that need to be solved simultaneously:
(1) MMs [almost always] need to be at the top of each system;
(2) MMs potentially need to be other places (e.g., bottom of each syst
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> So I'd like to propose that we have the task of changing \eyeglasses from
> make-postscript-markup to 'path be a Frog task.
>
> Any takers?
I'll take care of it. I've added new issues to keep track of my progress:
http://code.google.com/p
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Pap Lôrinc wrote:
>> HTH
> - Thanks Carl, but I've applied the imagemagick patch, did a long clean and
> make all, but the make check failed in the same place.
>
> Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2009-11-26 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
> Copyright: Copyright (C) 19
> HTH
- Thanks Carl, but I've applied the imagemagick patch, did a long clean and
make all, but the make check failed in the same place.
Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2009-11-26 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2009 ImageMagick Studio LLC
Features: OpenMP
Is it too o
Hi Joe,
> An alternative would be to go directly to the institutions that have an
> interest in notation software -- the (many) music colleges. Most of
> these have large numbers of computers with either or both of Finale and
> Sibelius installed (to say nothing of other music software), and if I
On 6/18/10 5:04 PM, "Pap Lôrinc" wrote:
>>> - I just did (make check?), it fails (I guess, I'm not sure what to look
>>> for).
>> This is absolutely critical for any large-scale code change.
> - I have checked out a clean clone of lily and after running
> ./autogen.sh
> make all
> make check
> > - I just did (make check?), it fails (I guess, I'm not sure
what to look for).
> This is absolutely critical for any large-scale code change.
- I have checked out a clean clone of
lily and after running
./autogen.sh
make all
make check
(and importing it into Eclipse which doesn't change
On 06/15/2010 09:19 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> One idea I've toyed with is seeking a grant to work on lilypond.
> Various governments and agencies give research grants; I'm pretty
> certain that we could get a grant to improve medieval chant
> notation or contemporary non-Western scales or whatno
Hi Mike,
This is very impressive. Thanks for your work on this. I just have a
few comments for you about the SVG-related code.
Thanks,
Patrick
http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/12001/13007
File scm/lily-library.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/12001/13007#new
Thanks for working on this, Neil. Just one quick comment, and
otherwise, LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/931041/diff/14001/15007
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/931041/diff/14001/15007#newcode757
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:757: multi-measure r
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I'm trying to do regression test checking, but it doesn't seem to be working
> right.
>
> I did
>
> make test-baseline
>
> Then I switched to my new branch and did
>
> make && make check
>
> I found some differences, so I patched the code, th
Op vrijdag 18-06-2010 om 17:32 uur [tijdzone +], schreef
n.putt...@gmail.com:
> On 2010/06/18 11:29:23, jan.nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> > I'll go ahead and test on a 32 bit machine then. It compiles
> > fine for me.
>
> I'm using a 64 bit machine (Ubuntu 10.04).
Weird, me too.
> Any tips on h
On 2010/06/18 11:29:23, jan.nieuwenhuizen wrote:
I'll go ahead and test on a 32 bit machine then. It compiles
fine for me.
I'm using a 64 bit machine (Ubuntu 10.04).
Any tips on how I can debug via gdb?
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1428042/show
__
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, wrote:
>
>> If I run a test file, e.g.,
>
>> out/bin/lilypond -d backend=svg -d svg-woff --output=woff example-1.ly
>
> Yeah. Where has example-1.ly gone? Can't we have some simple
> test files in input/, what was wrong with that?
I killed them all in preparat
On 2010/06/17 20:07:23, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I also think we should stay away from SVG features that didn't make it
into SVG
Tiny 1.2. altglyph is one of those features.
See my comment below for a possibility.
Okay. I heard that SVG 1.2 (esp. Tiny) was dead; but esp. as
does not work
Do you compile with --disable-optimising?
Yes.
I've done a few more tests, and the doc build compiles fine with an
optimized
binary, but crashes consistently on f2/lily-6d3b14b3.ly when using an
unoptimized binary.
I'll go ahead and test on a 32 bit machine then. It compiles
fine for me
Carl Sorensen writes:
>> The bounty is 25€ for creating symbols nicely integrating with the
>> normal Lilypond fonts (and not confusable with other accents or marks),
>
> I'll take the font work.
Great!
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
19 matches
Mail list logo
