Re: [PATCH] Experimental support for woff fonts in svg

Op maandag 31-05-2010 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan Nieuwenhuizen: > Experimental support for woff fonts in svg. And uploaded a new version of this patch that creates the css font list dynamically. See http://lilypond.org/people/janneke/woff/ Issue created. URL: http://coderevie

Re: Woodwind diagrams (issue1425041)

Mike, I'm sorry, but I had some comments earlier that I somehow erased with inadvertent keystrokes, so I added them back in. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/1/8 File scm/lily-library.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/1/8#newcode522 scm/lily-libr

[PATCH] Experimental support for woff fonts in svg

Experimental support for woff fonts in svg. Use out/bin/lilypond -d backend=svg example-1.ly out/bin/lilypond -d backend=svg -d svg-woff --output=woff example-1.ly cp example-1.svg woff.svg mf/out/emmentaler-20.woff /var/www/woff and use firefox 3.6 or later to browse http://localhos

Re: Woodwind diagrams (issue1425041)

Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol, Message: Hi Mike, This is super work, you're obviously a schemer extraordinaire. ;) I've copied my comments from the original set, and added a few more (you'll see some reiterate Carl's points). I think woodwind-diagrams.scm is a bit unwieldy in i

Woodwind diagrams (issue1425041)

The new patch worked. I've put some comments in line. Great job, Mike! http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/1/8 File scm/lily-library.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041/diff/1/8#newcode492 scm/lily-library.scm:492: (cons In general, I prefer to have the first argument on

[PATCH] Mike's woodwind diagrams (replaces existing patchset on Rietveld)

Hi everybody, I had a few problems posting comments on Mike's original patchset, plus two files were only visible via download, so I've uploaded a replacement issue here: http://codereview.appspot.com/1425041 Thanks, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing li

Re: woodwind diagrams in lilypond (http://codereview.appspot.com/1385041)

On 31 May 2010 07:08, Mike Solomon wrote: >    Strange...git-cl didn't complain when I uploaded it, but then again, I > don't know if I entered the right parameters.  I've attached the patch to > this email - could someone please throw it on Rietveld and email the list > once it's done?  Thank yo

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

Hello, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:05:08PM +0100, James Lowe wrote: Graham, Graham Percival wrote: Anyway, what does the texinfo manual say about @-commands in node names? Could you look this up, James? http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html#No