Re: [PATCH] Issue 1046

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Marc Hohl wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely > @@ -1470,13 +1470,33 @@ text markup. > +...@lilypond[quote,ragged-right,verbatim] > +music = \relative c' { > +  < a\3 \deadNote c\2 a'\1 >4 > +  < b\3 \deadNote d\2 b'\1 >4 > +  < c\3

Re: [PATCH] Issue 1037

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
Graham Percival schrieb: Thanks! Unfortunately, a few people wanted links to the unstable docs as well. I don't see the value of this, but please add them anyway. See the old website's doc pages for a list of the version numbers. I only found 2.11, all other odd numbers are linked to their

Re: [PATCH] Issue 1046

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
Graham Percival schrieb: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:45:36PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote: /home/marc/git/lilypond/Documentation/out/notation/fretted-strings.texi:32: I c an't find file `c6/lily-4f6e19ca-systems.texi'. @temp ->@input c6/lily-4f6e19ca-systems.texi

Re: [PATCH] Use iterator for STL std::map element access.

2010-03-30 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/819041/show >> >> Is this the correct way to return an element from a map? > > It looks OK.  Within google we have a function > >  template >  boo

Re: [PATCH] includeGraceNotes: lyrics syllables of grace notes

2010-03-30 Thread Neil Puttock
On 30 March 2010 16:00, Richard Gay wrote: > It worked for me with \grace and \appoggiatura notes but lilypond > showed warnings nevertheless (as noted in the patched > `Documentation/notation/vocal.itely'). I tried to fix these spurious > warnings but failed. The patch applies to current git > (

Re: [PATCH] Issue 1046

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:45:36PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote: > /home/marc/git/lilypond/Documentation/out/notation/fretted-strings.texi:32: > I c > an't find file `c6/lily-4f6e19ca-systems.texi'. > @temp ->@input c6/lily-4f6e19ca-systems.texi >@includezzz .

Re: [PATCH] Issue 1037

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
Thanks! Unfortunately, a few people wanted links to the unstable docs as well. I don't see the value of this, but please add them anyway. See the old website's doc pages for a list of the version numbers. oh, maybe it would be good to have two separate lists -- one for stable docs, and one for

Re: [PATCH] Correction in snippets

2010-03-30 Thread Neil Puttock
On 30 March 2010 20:29, Marc Hohl wrote: > Hello, > > I found a little mistake in the snippets; here is a patch to correct it. Thanks, applied. Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/

[PATCH] Issue 1037

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
While waiting for make doc to settle down, I found issue 1037 and hopefully fixed it. Marc From e120a73a45b41cead6acbc381fc1cb547bf8fbea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Hohl Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:46:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Issue 1037: Links to old manuals --- Documentation/web/manual

[PATCH] Issue 1046

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
I stumbled across Issue 1046 and tried to add some lines and a short example, see the attached patch. I have to say that I am not very familiar with texinfo; doing make all; make doc fails after a considerable amount of time: (/home/marc/git/lilypond/Documentation/out/notation/fretted-strings.

[PATCH] Correction in snippets

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
Hello, I found a little mistake in the snippets; here is a patch to correct it. Marc From 872a719d82e800e958339aa6faceb2baf93735a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Hohl Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:27:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Correction: no negative fret numbers in snippet --- .../new/adding

Re: [PATCH] includeGraceNotes: lyrics syllables of grace notes

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:00:39PM +0200, Richard Gay wrote: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-03/msg00362.html > there seem to be also other people with the same concern. Hence the > proposed patch attached. Wow, thanks! Especially for the doc parts. I can't speak to the

Re: what's up with the git instructions?

2010-03-30 Thread Mark Polesky
Graham Percival wrote: > Basically, when I was setting up lilypond.org this > morning, I was annoyed that I had to copy&paste from CG > 2.2.1, then hunt around for another place in 2.2.2, and > then write something manually. I don't want to think > about getting the source code. Graham, I'm sorr

[PATCH] includeGraceNotes: lyrics syllables of grace notes

2010-03-30 Thread Richard Gay
Hi, according to http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/bug-lilyp...@gnu.org/3567106.html lyrics syllables associated with grace notes have been disabled some time ago. However, I would like to put syllables to grace notes but could not find out how to do this with current versions of lilypond. A

Re: what's up with the git instructions?

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 30-03-2010 om 10:52 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham Percival: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:21:08AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Op dinsdag 30-03-2010 om 07:04 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham > > Percival: > > > Basically, when I was setting up lilypond.org this morning

Re: what's up with the git instructions?

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:21:08AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op dinsdag 30-03-2010 om 07:04 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham > Percival: > > > I think this is a step backwards. Granted, we have lily-git now, so > > it's not as pressing an issue, but I still think it's a step > > backw

Re: what's up with the git instructions?

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 30-03-2010 om 07:04 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham Percival: > I think this is a step backwards. Granted, we have lily-git now, so > it's not as pressing an issue, but I still think it's a step > backwards. What about http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-0

Re: Issue 659: alternate segno symbol (issue181144)

2010-03-30 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote: > Marc Hohl schrieb: >> [...] >> Is the segno patch ready to be applied, or did I miss something? > I don't want to annoy you, but if there is some more work I should > do to improve the patch, let me know ... on the other hand, > if it is

Re: Issue 659: alternate segno symbol (issue181144)

2010-03-30 Thread Marc Hohl
Marc Hohl schrieb: [...] Is the segno patch ready to be applied, or did I miss something? I don't want to annoy you, but if there is some more work I should do to improve the patch, let me know ... on the other hand, if it is ready now, don't hesitate to push it ;-) Marc ___