Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2010 22:21:27 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Hi,
>
> The git repository at savannah has been updated, everyone
> should do a fresh clone.
>
> If you haven't already done so, make some aliases
>
> git config --global
> url.git+ssh://git.savannah.gnu.org/srv/git/.insteado
Hi,
The git repository at savannah has been updated, everyone
should do a fresh clone.
If you haven't already done so, make some aliases
git config --global url.git+ssh://git.savannah.gnu.org/srv/git/.insteadof
gnu:
git config --global url.git://git.savannah.gnu.org/.insteadof gnu-anon:
hello,
Mark Polesky wrote:
I have vague memories of being confused on Windows, not
using a command line (double-clicking my file icon). If I
recall, the only output I could find was the resulting log
file, and I often felt under-informed whenever the process
would hang.
Actually with windo
James Lowe wrote:
> So, from a non-Unix user who doesn't really 'know much
> stuff', I'd like to just add that I think it would be a
> nice step to know that the PDF was created, for example
> some earlier versions of Mac OS will not create the PDF if
> it is already open by another App, Windows li
Hello
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> Why don't you alias lilypond to
>>
>> (lilypond "$*" && echo Success) || echo Failed
>>
>> simpler, and more conformant to the unix tradition ("no news is good
>> news").
>>
> We already print out a quite extensive log of informati
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>>> I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages
>>> from
>>> lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
>>> actually completed or not.
>>>
>>> Typically, you would see this:
>>>
>>
>> Why do
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
I've always thought it a real shame that the standard set of messages from
lilypond left you with a nagging sense of uncertainty whether it had
actually completed or not.
Typically, you would see this:
Why do