I apologize for this email; I jumped to a false conclusion and
made a baseless accusation. I now have no reason to believe that
weblily poses a risk.
I'm sorry.
- Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:21:24PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> Mr. Weblily,
>
> I like your enthusiasm with yo
I admit that I only tested getcwd, but doesn't a jail normally
report the main dir as / rather than /home/lily ?
... hmm, ok, apparently not. Ok, it might be safe after all. At
least, my earlier investigations were flawed, and I'm not keen to
continue snooping around.
- Graham
On Wed, Mar 10,
this is what weblily wrote to me a couple of weeks ago.
**
Hi Han-Wen,
I've continued to work on weblily.net. Now it looks to me almost like
something useful. Of cource, I've taken your advice and now LilyPond
is running in a jail.
Quite cool: I modified the notation reference: When you click on
Mr. Weblily,
I like your enthusiasm with your weblily project, but for Mao's
sake please learn something about computer security. The current
website is completely insecure.
This is not a theoretical concern. It would take me approximately
two minutes to delete everything in your /home/lily/ di
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:13:57PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/3/5 Graham Percival :
> > texinfo is using Documentation/macros.itexi instead of
> > Documentation/es/macros.itexi. Try playing with the -I dirs given
> > in website.make. (lines 89-98)
>
> weblinks.itexi is being generated
