Francisco Vila wrote:
> Compile stopped there, then I removed the @ref and compile
> succeeded; I even added a warning following Graham. An
> extra point is: nobody told she could compile the docs
> without the remove.
I just successfully compiled commit 715dc5e, which contains
the @ref being dis
Francisco Vila wrote Monday, March 01, 2010 11:29 PM
2010/3/1 Mark Polesky :
Graham Percival wrote:
It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
included/
Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
I am sorry for not to have l
2010/3/1 Mark Polesky :
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
>> included/
>
> Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
> compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
I am sorry for not to have looked for the origin of the problem in depth;
C
Graham Percival wrote:
> It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
> included/
Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
$ git grep -h -n '@ref' Documentation/included/compile.itexi
43:program. For more information, see @ref{Bui
2010/3/1 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
>> docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
>> but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
> docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
> but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from an included
> file.
> Is anybody
Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(defin
Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from an included
file.
Is anybody of you able to compile the doc without a similar fix? Thanks.
diff --git
Jonathan Kulp schrieb:
[...]
There is a reason for this warning, I'm sure. (I think I'm the one
who put it there). Before deleting it, try using the string number
orientation command and see if it has any effect on the string
number when it's not inside a chord construct.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
>
>> Marc Hohl schrieb:
>>
>>> Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
>>>
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
> nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
>
>
>> http://code
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Marc Hohl schrieb:
>
>> Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
>>
>>> Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
> File ly/chord-repetition-ini
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
ly/chord-repetition-i
Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(defin
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Should the new segno sign be included in the documentation?
> If yes, where?
In the feta font (I think that's included/font-table.ly), and in NR
1.2.5 rehearsal marks, in the example wi ththe other segno signs.
(if I understand the matter at han
Le 1 mars 2010 à 10:00, Marc Hohl a écrit :
> nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
>> File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
>> ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(define-public (tab-r
Marc Hohl schrieb:
n.putt...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi Marc,
LGTM, though I still think this is a lot of effort for a very obscure
and little-used symbol.
[...]
Should the new segno sign be included in the documentation?
If yes, where?
Apart from that, are there any further objections to this pa
nicolas.sce...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3
File ly/chord-repetition-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1/3#newcode51
ly/chord-repetition-init.ly:51: #(define-public (tab-repeat-chord
previous-chord location duration articulations)
It
17 matches
Mail list logo
