>> Perhaps I'm wrong, and the whole thing is a non-issue: ghostscript
>> can compute the exact bounding box of an EPS file, AFAIK, taking
>> care of the real dimensions of all glyphs (relying on the outlines
>> instead of the metrics).
>
> I don't know what ghostscript can do, but even if it canno
>> > I never realized un-archived mailing lists existed. :-) I would be
>> > okay with either option.
>>
>> Although I'm pretty certain that we could make such a list on
>> savannah, I was thinking about just doing it on lilynet.
Presumably, a "list on savannah" is run using GNU Mailman, in whi
John Mandereau wrote:
> Where has gone the comment on the directory structure of a
> translation? It's still needed in the new roadmap.
Oops. How's this?
| | TRANSLATED MANUALS:
| | Each language's directory can contain...
| | 1) translated versions of:
| | * top so
>Original Message
>From: c_soren...@byu.edu
>Date: 17/01/2010 1:19
>To: "pound...@lineone.net", "fr...@lilynet.net"
, "lilypond-devel"
>Subj: Re: [frogs] CG Feedback
>
>
>I think that ./autogen.sh will automatically run configure, so that
it's not
>necessary to run ./configure after you d
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 à 22:27 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
> ROADMAP has always confused me. I prefer something more
> like the attached file.
Hi Mark, thanks for you work work; I only have two nitpicks below to
suggest.
> | | TRANSLATED MANUALS:
> | |
> | |-- de/ Ger
On 1/16/10 11:14 AM, "pound...@lineone.net" wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I thought I'd post a quick note of the issues I faced downloading and
> building LilyPond. On the whole the experience was far less painful
> that I thought it would be but I hope the following may be of use. I
> would have pos
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:15:22PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2010-01-16, Graham Percival wrote:
> > I'm thinking that an open mailing list with no archives would be
> > ok, but we could make it closed instead if we wanted to feel a bit
> > more private.
>
> I never realized un-archived ma
On 2010-01-16, Graham Percival wrote:
> One idea that I've been considering for over a year is making a
> "social" mailing list for lilypond developers. Not for discussing
> bugs or new features; just to get to know each other better.
> Think of it as the electronic equivalent of office-mates goin
One idea that I've been considering for over a year is making a
"social" mailing list for lilypond developers. Not for discussing
bugs or new features; just to get to know each other better.
Think of it as the electronic equivalent of office-mates going to
the pub together on a Thursday night. I
Hi everybody,
This patch allows an episema to be typset over a single neume (issue
#189) and ensures it can be positioned correctly inside the stave.
Since the requirements of an episema are slightly different from
standard TextSpanner grobs, I've decided to create a new engraver for
this purpose:
On 16.01.2010, at 18:04, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Mark Polesky
wrote:
A while back I proposed the name "lilypatch" for what is now
"lily-git". I didn't hear any response so I suppose that
most of you prefer the current name. I thought I'd mention
it once more
2010/1/16 Mark Polesky :
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/changes/index.html
This always happens with font changes on kainhofer.com since it
doesn't do a clean docs build every day.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
Graham Percival wrote:
> Err, what's the pun?
1) a patch of lilies, as in http://www.thelilypatch.org/
2) a git patch for LilyPond
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-de
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> A while back I proposed the name "lilypatch" for what is now
> "lily-git". I didn't hear any response so I suppose that
> most of you prefer the current name. I thought I'd mention
> it once more though, because I like the pun on the word
>
Neil Puttock wrote:
>> The example on the "changes" page is not displaying
>> properly.
>
> Where?
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/changes/index.html
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
A while back I proposed the name "lilypatch" for what is now
"lily-git". I didn't hear any response so I suppose that
most of you prefer the current name. I thought I'd mention
it once more though, because I like the pun on the word
"patch". But I'll drop it if no one cares.
- Mark
_
Looks fine to me:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/changes
(hint: since this changed something in mf/, you need to do a make
doc-clean, make clean, why not make distclean, and then rebuild
everything from scratch. Yes, this is already in the issue tracker)
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Ja
2010/1/16 Mark Polesky :
> The example on the "changes" page is not displaying
> properly.
Where?
Looks fine here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/changes/index#top
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
Neil Puttock wrote:
> LGTM, pushed to master.
>
> I've just made one minor change: new features go at the
> top of changes.tely.
The example on the "changes" page is not displaying
properly.
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
On 1/16/10 7:47 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2010/1/16 Carl Sorensen :
>
>> Now if we didn't find an articulation on the note event, we search through
>> the list of tabstring events to find a non-empty tabstring event. Why are
>> we doing this second check? Is there another way to get a tab
2010/1/16 Carl Sorensen :
> Now if we didn't find an articulation on the note event, we search through
> the list of tabstring events to find a non-empty tabstring event. Why are
> we doing this second check? Is there another way to get a tabstring event
> besides adding a string as an articulat
LTGM
although I'd put input/ under REGRESSION TESTING, and elisp/ +
vim/ under MISC, or something like that. But it's definitely an
improvement over the current file. Please push.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:27:42PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> ROADMAP has always confused me.
> Here's a file with all different spacings from 2.0 to 4.0...
Thanks again. I like 2.5 most.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Here's a file with all different spacings from 2.0 to 4.0...
Looking at some scores with two lyrics lines (mostly oratorios with two
different language), I would tend to choose 2.8 or 3.0.
+1.
There are some other issues I notice with the layout:
1) For my taste t
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Saturday, January 16, 2010 11:32 AM
Here's a file with all different spacings from 2.0 to 4.0...
Looking at some scores with two lyrics lines (mostly oratorios
with two
different language), I would tend to choose 2.8 or 3.0.
2.8 looks good to me.
Trevor
_
Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2010 08:56:43 schrieben Sie:
> >> #'minimum-distance = #3.2
> >
> > ... and for everyone who is just as lazy as I am: Attached is a
> > sample file so that you don't have to try to create a minimal
> > example yourself...
>
> Thanks. IMHO the distance between lyrics lines i
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, January 15, 2010 11:01 PM
Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2010 18:24:55 schrieb Joe Neeman:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 18:08 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> If you can send us an example of what it looks like (so that we
> don't
> have to guess which settings you will set
>> #'minimum-distance = #3.2
> ... and for everyone who is just as lazy as I am: Attached is a
> sample file so that you don't have to try to create a minimal
> example yourself...
Thanks. IMHO the distance between lyrics lines is slightly too big.
Werner
___
28 matches
Mail list logo
