On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:51:26AM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On a unrelated note, I noticed that all of the input files under
> input/ have been removed in
>
> 2c89fdcaa84c848c9a81bc3b74d26359a1e93529
> Author: Graham Percival 2009-10-04
> 10:42:12
>
> while I applaud trimmng the direct
On 01/07/2010 04:24 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 16:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Just had a successful build on line, it fails because of permissions on
>> the info dir though, it was either "export GS_LIB="/home/$USER/.fonts"
>> or "# noroo
All done and submitted.
On a unrelated note, I noticed that all of the input files under
input/ have been removed in
2c89fdcaa84c848c9a81bc3b74d26359a1e93529
Author: Graham Percival 2009-10-04 10:42:12
while I applaud trimmng the directory, some of these files have
actually been instrumental t
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 07:49 +, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Reviewers: hanwenn,
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/182042/diff/1004/6
> File lily/lily-lexer.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/182042/diff/1004/6#newcode274
> lily/lily-lexer.cc:274: Lily_lexer::set_identifier (SCM
Mark Polesky wrote Friday, January 08, 2010 6:15 PM
Graham Percival wrote:
***snip "do we actually want a separate 'For unix
developers' " discussion about the new CG 1 introduction
***
I'm not happy with the current layout in having it as a
node. If we have it at all, I'd suggest a small bi
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:07:33PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:56:45PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> For less than that we released new 2.11 versions with a fourth minor
> >> number.
> >
> > 2.11 was u
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:56:45PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> For less than that we released new 2.11 versions with a fourth minor number.
>
> 2.11 was unstable, which has different rules than stable.
If we figure out what's wrong, and
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:15:18AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > I'm not happy with the current layout in having it as a
> > node. If we have it at all, I'd suggest a small bit at
> > the top of the "for other contributors" section. Mark,
> > what do you think about this
2010/1/8 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:56:45PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> For less than that we released new 2.11 versions with a fourth minor number.
>
> 2.11 was unstable, which has different rules than stable.
Ah, stable can tolerate this and unstable can not?
--
Francis
Graham Percival wrote:
> ***snip "do we actually want a separate 'For unix
> developers' " discussion about the new CG 1 introduction
> ***
>
> I'm not happy with the current layout in having it as a
> node. If we have it at all, I'd suggest a small bit at
> the top of the "for other contributors"
> Thus, the slash of the character sticks out of the bounding box by
> some amount.
This might cause problems if images are converted to, say, cropped PNG
images. You must assure somehow that the slash won't get cut off.
Everything else looks fine! BTW, I don't get any warning from my
fontforg
>> [Not tested yet the actual changes.] Is your fontforge version
>> compiled with --enable-double?
>
> I use fontforge out of the box from my ubuntu distro. I don't know
> how it is built.
Since you get warnings even without your changes, you haven't
--enable-double. I strongly suggest to get
I've added the below material to CG 1 introduction. I'd really like
to get going with this; is anybody else willing to mentor? In
particular, I'm looking for doc and translation people.
1. Doc mentors: this will let me spend more time on the build system,
new website, GUB, and the like.
2. Tran
***snip "do we actually want a separate 'For unix developers' "
discussion about the new CG 1 introduction ***
I'm not happy with the current layout in having it as a node. If we
have it at all, I'd suggest a small bit at the top of the "for other
contributors" section. Mark, what do you think a
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 1/8/10 1:54 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>> It's definitely not possible to do this on my eee 701; it might be
>> possible on my aspire one with a full-screen window; it might be
>> possible on my desktop with a non-full-screen window bu
On 1/8/10 1:54 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:46:51PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 1/7/10 5:10 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> That's because you're looking at the fuzzy doc-webpage in the 2.13
>>> docs, instead of the real "staging" webpage in ~graham/.
>
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:56:45PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> For less than that we released new 2.11 versions with a fourth minor number.
2.11 was unstable, which has different rules than stable.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 13:56 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> I volunteer but I don't have the lightest idea of what to do :-)
Blindly replacing texi2html init file (and probably the default CSS file
too) by the one from master branch. At least, that's what I'll try
first as soon as I fin
2010/1/8 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 10:02:12 schrieb Graham Percival:
>> > Sorry, we're not going to have another 2.12 release unless there's
>> > an overwhelming need for it.
>>
>> Pardon? What would you do
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 12:15 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> grr. If you add new files in master, check that you add them properly.
>
> file from VC not distributed:
> lilypond-2.13.11/Documentation/es/search-box.ihtml
> file from VC not distributed:
> lilypond-2.13.11/Documentation/h
grr. If you add new files in master, check that you add them properly.
file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.13.11/Documentation/es/search-box.ihtml
file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.13.11/Documentation/hu/search-box.ihtml
- Graham
___
lily
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 10:02:12 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > Sorry, we're not going to have another 2.12 release unless there's
> > an overwhelming need for it.
>
> Pardon? What would you do if lilypond 2.12 would not print
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 09:58:31 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:48:24PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > I *really* wish the website had a "sitemap" with links to every manual
> > from the stable and development documentation.
> >
> > Maybe a two-column webpage with the 2
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 10:02:12 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:29:43AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > Hello, I can not say since when, but currently all 2.12 docs show
> > titles and links in English:
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-p
2010/1/8 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:29:43AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> Hello, I can not say since when, but currently all 2.12 docs show
>> titles and links in English:
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 03:18:41 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> It's basically the same set of links as in the 2.12 documentation. But it
> doesn't have all of the choices for each manual (one big page, pdf).
> Therefore, when you click on any manual, you get to a page that gives you
> all the choice
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 01:29 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> Hello, I can not say since when, but currently all 2.12 docs show
> titles and links in English:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilyp
I posted this patch some time ago, and according
to Neil's proposals, I uploaded it to rietveld.
This patch features a new function similar to the
already existing ly:grob-set-property!
http://codereview.appspot.com/183159
___
lilypond-devel mailing
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:29:43AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello, I can not say since when, but currently all 2.12 docs show
> titles and links in English:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:34:50PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > You could change the web branch to point to the 2.13 CG.
>
> That's a good idea; but can we make it future-proof?
In the new website, that was done a few weeks ago:
scripts/build/create-version-itexi.py
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:48:24PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I *really* wish the website had a "sitemap" with links to every manual
> from the stable and development documentation.
>
> Maybe a two-column webpage with the 2.12 links in the left column and
> the 2.13 links in the right column?
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:46:51PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/7/10 5:10 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > That's because you're looking at the fuzzy doc-webpage in the 2.13
> > docs, instead of the real "staging" webpage in ~graham/.
>
> No, I'm looking on the docs that are built on my
n.putt...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/181144/diff/1002/1003
File input/regression/bar-line-segno.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/181144/diff/1002/1003#newcode9
input/regression/bar-line-segno.ly:9: \relative \new StaffGroup <<
\relative c'
Ok, done. I copied this
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/6 Marc Hohl :
I've just posted a patch for the alternate segno sign.
To use the new symbol stored at scripts.varsegno, I have
adapted the arguments for the \bar command.
Very nice. It's a bit different from the examples posted on the
tr
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
-) Compiling the font gives some warnings:
Invoking "fontforge -script feta26.pe feta26.pfb"...
Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
Internal
> -) Compiling the font gives some warnings:
>
> Invoking "fontforge -script feta26.pe feta26.pfb"...
> Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams.
> Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
> Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
> Internal Error in sc
On 01/07/2010 04:24 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 16:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Just had a successful build on line, it fails because of permissions on
>> the info dir though, it was either "export GS_LIB="/home/$USER/.fonts"
>> or "# noroo
37 matches
Mail list logo
