We either need one more button for lily-git, or one less.
Taking a completely hypthetical example, suppose a new doc
contributors writes a nice addition for the docs, but only uses one
space after a period (the heretic!). I ask for an updated patch. Our
fearless contributor edits the file accord
Commit 79396368e20724a89d34c7a4c53989b8dace5814 (below) changes this
from %s/../share/ to %s/share/. This is required to make the regtest
comparison work in GUB wiht the new regtest names.
I'm not 100% certain that this doesn't mess up the normal "make
test-check" or whatever it is that programme
http://codereview.appspot.com/181109/show
there are some open todos, which I'll look into, probably over the
weekend, but here is a sample:
Interpreting music... (initialize #
)(start-trans #
)(process-music #
)(process-acknowledged #
)(saw: # coming from #)(process-acknowledged #
)(process-ac
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 06:35 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> why can I say
>
> \new PianoStaff \with {
> \override StaffGrouper
> #'between-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
> } ...
>
> but not
>
> \new Staff \with {
> \override VerticalAxisGroup
> #'n
On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:40:01PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> configure:9182: checking pango/pangoft2.h usability
>> configure:9182: gcc -c
> ...
>> -arch ppc -arch i386
>
> Hmm.
>
>> It looks to me like the warning is generated becaus
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> Would it be a good idea to *draw* these angle brackets instead of
> using glyphs from a font? I'm thinking that there would be fewer
> problems that way.
Or maybe we could add a set of angle brackets to the Emmentaler font,
and use thos
Hello,
Recently James reported a problem compiling the tablature regression
tests containing angle brackets (entered with \harmonic). See the
thread here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-12/msg00511.html
The problem is that relatively few fonts contain the Unicode
charact
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:40:01PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> configure:9182: checking pango/pangoft2.h usability
> configure:9182: gcc -c
...
> -arch ppc -arch i386
Hmm.
> It looks to me like the warning is generated because we have 2 architectures
> in the gcc call, so the error here app
On 12/30/09 3:20 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:52:56PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.6)
>> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt mf.base
>> tcfmgr: config file `tcfmgr.map' (usually in $TEXMFMAIN/texconfig) not
>> found.
>> fmt
On 12/30/09 4:15 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:06:12PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 12/30/09 3:14 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
configure: WARNING: Python.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the
preprocessor!
>>>
>>> That's not normal.
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:06:12PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 12/30/09 3:14 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> >> configure: WARNING: Python.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the
> >> preprocessor!
> >
> > That's not normal.
>
> How can I find out about the tests used to check "us
On 12/30/09 3:14 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:31:11AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I did end up doing a reconfigure (due to trying the out-of-tree build, which
>> also failed, but that's another story).
>>
>> During my configure, I've found the following war
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:31:11AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I did end up doing a reconfigure (due to trying the out-of-tree build, which
>> also failed, but that's another story).
>>
>> During my configure, I've found the following
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:52:56PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.6)
> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt mf.base
> tcfmgr: config file `tcfmgr.map' (usually in $TEXMFMAIN/texconfig) not
> found.
> fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
> I can't find t
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:31:11AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I did end up doing a reconfigure (due to trying the out-of-tree build, which
> also failed, but that's another story).
>
> During my configure, I've found the following warnings:
>
> checking g++ version... 4.0.1
> configure: WAR
On 12/29/09 10:26 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> So now make fails, with this error message:
>
> Interesting. When was the last time you did a fresh "make" ? Was it
> before 21 Dec 2009 ?
>
>> ./include/libc-extension.hh:51: err
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 09:59:51AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type -l -exec rm -f -- '{}' +
[...]
> >> Well, if that's part of POSIX, then adding it can't be a bad
> >> thing. :)
> >
> > Isn't AFAIK.
>
> The '+' thing appears to be POSIX if I am reading the G
On 12/29/09 10:26 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> So now make fails, with this error message:
>
> Interesting. When was the last time you did a fresh "make" ? Was it
> before 21 Dec 2009 ?
No, I've done several fresh makes since
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 12/30/09 6:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
@Carl:
I am not at all familiar with SVG. Could you please produce a file
similar to the one you sent already with different rotating angles?
I can only produce a file like that with the clefs you have designed if you
ge
2009/12/30 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Op zaterdag 05-09-2009 om 18:53 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
> Vila:
>
> Hi Francisco,
>
>> I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
>
>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
>
> Great, thanks! This has become quite an artic
On 12/30/09 6:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>
> @Carl:
> I am not at all familiar with SVG. Could you please produce a file
> similar to the one you sent already with different rotating angles?
I can only produce a file like that with the clefs you have designed if you
generate svg output instea
Francisco Vila schrieb:
2009/12/29 Marc Hohl :
I concatenated the pdfs to one file, which is too big for the list, so I
put it on my website:
http://www.hohlart.de/marc/gclef-slant.pdf
I know that there is a spurious error on value 2, but I think that's not the
main problem. Which value loo
Op zaterdag 05-09-2009 om 18:53 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
Hi Francisco,
> I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
Great, thanks! This has become quite an article. Did you
consider thoughts in this thread
On 30 Dec 2009, at 12:53, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 12:27:25 schrieb David Kastrup:
Hans Aberg writes:
Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5'
unless
specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
For sextuplets, there is a convention that the
On 30 Dec 2009, at 12:27, David Kastrup wrote:
Hans Aberg writes:
Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5' unless
specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
For sextuplets, there is a convention that the should be in 3, so
there is an implicit rule 3'+3' - there should be n
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 12:27:25 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Hans Aberg writes:
> > Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5' unless
> > specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
> >
> > For sextuplets, there is a convention that the should be in 3, so
> > there is an implici
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 06:55:38 schrieb Patrick McCarty:
> I forgot to mention that with this patch, hyperlinks have a "#"
> appended to them instead of a "#" followed by the node name. So it's
> still not satisfactory.
>
> I tried to figure out where the hyperlink names are generated. I
Hans Aberg writes:
> Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5' unless
> specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
>
> For sextuplets, there is a convention that the should be in 3, so
> there is an implicit rule 3'+3' - there should be no subbeaming of the
> 3'. But a compose mi
fyi, this just might be a nice idea
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 30 Dec 2009, at 00:17, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I find the current LilyPond structure hard to cope with when wanting
subbeaming.
Yes, right now there is no sound method for dealing with subbeaming
(or beam
subdivision, as I think it's called). I hope to fix that.
That would be good. I thi
David Kastrup writes:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>>> Then change it to something like this:
>>>
>>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f --
>>>
>>> Or even this (completely POSIX compliant):
>>>
>>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type -l -exec rm -f -- '{}' +
>>
31 matches
Mail list logo
