Moving input/regression to tests/ ?

2009-10-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi, This is an idea for the far-off future, but IMO it would be nice to see input/regression migrate to a new tests/ directory that looks something like this: tests `- general | `- *.ly `- musicxml `- *.xml `- *.mxl Since the input/ directory now only contains regressi

Re: Switching to Waf instead of SCons?

2009-10-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-09-25, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mercredi 16 septembre 2009 à 19:53 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude a > écrit : > > Checking for LilyPond binary : not found, trying standard check > > Checking for program lilypond: ok /home/jcharles/bin/lilypond > > Patrick McCarty wrote:

Re: GUB - Failed target: darwin-x86::cross/gcc

2009-10-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-10-03, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 01-10-2009 om 14:37 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > > to see if that would fix it, but for some reason I couldn't get that > > working; my normal method of adding "patches = [...]" didn't work. > > GUB just seemed to skip

Re: 2.12.3 testing

2009-10-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Graham Percival > wrote: >> >> Still, if you're feeling adventurous, you could give these a spin. >> Whatever crashes you get or failures score-compiling failures you >> report can't hurt our efforts to have

Re: 2.12.3 testing

2009-10-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > > Still, if you're feeling adventurous, you could give these a spin. > Whatever crashes you get or failures score-compiling failures you > report can't hurt our efforts to have a release. > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/ > (don't grab the 2.

[PATCH] Re: Some more problems with figured bass and extenders

2009-10-05 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Sonntag, 14. Juni 2009 23:37:40 schrieb Neil Puttock: > 2009/6/14 Reinhold Kainhofer : > > 2) If I have extender lines turned on, it is not possible to print markup > > as a figure inside the Staff context. If I try this, I always get the > > same extender warning and no figure is shown: > > Pro

[PATCH] Unsetting Voice.instrumentCueName

2009-10-05 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Currently, unsetting the instrumentCueName property results in a warning that '() is not a valid markup... This is fixed by the following patch, which prevents an InstrumentSwitch object from being created when unsetting instrumentCueName: http://codereview.appspot.com/124110 Okay to apply? C