Re: output-distance.py

2009-10-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-10-03, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 01/10/2009 20:45, Patrick McCarty disait : > > > >On 2009-10-01, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > >> > >>In fact, it was on a fresh local clone of the master branch as of > >>Reinhold's "Fix killCues ..." patch dated 2009-09-30 15:44:45. I > >>neve

Re: [PATCH] [doc] New paper margin handling

2009-10-03 Thread Michael Käppler
Would you mind preparing a patch to document the changes (in particular, right-margin)? Here you are. The changes that aren't applied yet (default margin scaling) are already integrated. Regards, Michael >From 6839cb0e9fa85f2ea7f1ee42faa6877408387704 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8

google code (I'm scatterbrained)

2009-10-03 Thread Graham Percival
One of the reasons I'm finally entering all these items is that I can no longer trust myself to remember everything. In fact, I even forgot to include some vital information in my announcement about google code! Priorities: I'm using the priority field in the Official LilyPond Policy (tm), namely

google code

2009-10-03 Thread Graham Percival
As requested by a few people, I'm finally using google code. Expect to see lots of doc and build issues getting dumped there over the next few hours. Putting an item on the tracker doesn't necessarily mean that I'm not going to work on it myself, but it *does* mean that I'm not working on it at th

Re: output-distance.py

2009-10-03 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 01/10/2009 20:45, Patrick McCarty disait : On 2009-10-01, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: In fact, it was on a fresh local clone of the master branch as of Reinhold's "Fix killCues ..." patch dated 2009-09-30 15:44:45. I never did a 'test-baseline' before. Would you like me to clean everythi

Re: [PATCH] Paper default margins - revised

2009-10-03 Thread Michael Käppler
Hopefully no whitespace / style issues this time. Argh... forget this. Here's a revised version. Cheers, Michael >From cf099ca1134b02a813e47109c684a8a100b04253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Michael=20K=C3=A4ppler?= Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:55:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Let default

Re: GUB - Failed target: darwin-x86::cross/gcc

2009-10-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op donderdag 01-10-2009 om 14:37 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick McCarty: > to see if that would fix it, but for some reason I couldn't get that > working; my normal method of adding "patches = [...]" didn't work. > GUB just seemed to skip over the "patches = [...]" line and only > applied t