Graham Percival wrote:
> Umm, I was joking. Well, kind-of joking. Yes, that's the only
> way you can do it, but no, I don't recommend it. I don't think
> that Joseph is desperately awaiting HTML output... actually, I'm
> pretty certain he builds them himself, anyway. And he's the only
> person
On 9/5/09 7:12 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 06:57:59AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 9/4/09 6:03 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> gperc...@sapphire:~/src/lilypond/Documentation/notation$ grep
>>> override editorial.itely expressive.itely pitches.itely
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 06:57:59AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 9/4/09 6:03 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > gperc...@sapphire:~/src/lilypond/Documentation/notation$ grep
> > override editorial.itely expressive.itely pitches.itely
> > repeats.itely rhythms.itely simultaneous.itely st
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:19:31AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:43 AM
>> For Trevor: the only way *you* can "touch" a file is by making a
>> git change to it. So if you really wanted to make the NR rebuilt,
>> you'd have to push a nonsense
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>> This value will be written in the output ps file, but seems to have no
>> effect.
>> To sum up: What's the intention of this line-width value in ps output files?
>
> I agree; it seems to have no effect. It also appears not to be
> duplicated in
I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
Some sections need more work and there are untouched blocks. Feel free
to reuse that material for other languages, I could help on the Es->En
translating if needed.
--
Francisco Vila. Bad
On 9/5/09 1:13 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Carl Sorensen wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 11:57 PM
>>
>> On 9/4/09 10:27 AM, "Trevor Daniels"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Carl Sorensen wrote" Friday, September 04,
>>> 2009
>>> 3:06 PM
Also, as you plan sections, remember that anyth
On 9/4/09 6:03 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:57:11PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 9/4/09 10:27 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>>> Carl Sorensen wrote" Friday, September 04, 2009
>>> 3:06 PM
Also, as you plan sections, remember that anything using \set o
Hi Joe,
I agree; it seems to have no effect. It also appears not to be
duplicated in the other backends, despite the comment. Perhaps it's
obsolete code?
Maybe. I hope somebody on the list (Han-Wen?) can explain why this was
added. Is this a kind of meta-information, which is just stored in t
Hi all,
here's the new version which includes all fixes but for the
"system-count=#1" issue, on which Joe can take a look on I hope.
http://codereview.appspot.com/109051/
Cheers,
Michael
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:
---
Documentation/notation/contemporary.itely | 81 +
1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/notation/contemporary.itely b/Documentation/notation/contemporary.itely
index 595eb07..aad01c8 100644
--- a/Documentation/notation/conte
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:43 AM
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 00:12:44 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Friday, September 04, 2009 10:51 PM
> > It seems that the NR was really las
12 matches
Mail list logo
