On 2009-09-03, Travis Briggs wrote:
> I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
> for OS X 10.5
>
> The patch is attached.
>
> Hope this is useful.
Thanks, this definitely helps.
I'm still a bit confused about the issues with ./configure failing to
detect the Century
On 2009-08-31, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 31 août 2009 à 10:16 +0200, John Mandereau a écrit :
> > Le dimanche 30 août 2009 à 16:05 -0700, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> > > Attached is a patch that modifies `make distclean' so that it behaves
> > > correctly.
> > >
> > > Okay to apply?
>
> BTW
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:20:54PM -0400, Travis Briggs wrote:
> I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
> for OS X 10.5
Thanks! I moved it to Problems, and fixed a few minor points (we
officially use "ma...@tie{}x" for the name). But this was all
extremely easy to
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:42:09AM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Currently it's just a menu of general sub-headings -- more will follow
> in the next days. It's intended to provide both a unified collection of
- I'm tempted to put it in front of Ancient, in an attempt to
remind everybody that
I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
for OS X 10.5
The patch is attached.
Hope this is useful.
-Travis
0001-Add-Compiling-on-Mac-OS-X-section-to-basic-compile.t.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailin
Hello everyone,
As discussed on the -user list, this is a patch to start a section in
the Specialist Notation chapter on contemporary music.
Currently it's just a menu of general sub-headings -- more will follow
in the next days. It's intended to provide both a unified collection of
references t
Joseph Wakeling wrote Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:22 PM
... if the previous patch doesn't work, I hope the one attached to
this
mail will. Let me know how it goes. :-)
Still has DOS line endings :( But it's really not a problem - I can
easily change them before applying.
I didn't appl
Hi Joe, you wroteThursday, September 03, 2009 10:35 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I then looked at the actual mail message. You're using
Thunderbird with inline attachments and quoted-printable
encoding. This is the problem. I seem to remember
Jonathan Kulp discovering that Thunderbird messed u
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> I searched around for some info on this and think I've found the correct way
> to set up Thunderbird.
... if the previous patch doesn't work, I hope the one attached to this
mail will. Let me know how it goes. :-)
Best wishes,
-- Joe
>From 9535dad80a5e1506f1ce775e1
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I then looked at the actual mail message. You're using
> Thunderbird with inline attachments and quoted-printable
> encoding. This is the problem. I seem to remember
> Jonathan Kulp discovering that Thunderbird messed up
> the line endings of patches.
>
> I'm not familia
Joe, you wrote Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:20 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks Joe. Initially these patches didn't apply either, but I
traced the reason to their having DOS (CRLF) line endings
rather than Unix (LF) line endings. When I changed that they
applied fine. (This actually might
11 matches
Mail list logo
