On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:21:33AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > ... and by some odd coincidence, we haven't made a stable release
> > with it in such a state. Imagine that!
>
> Does that mean that one is not supposed to report problems until a
> stable release has
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:36:33AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Well, yes. FIXMEs generally aren't impressive. The FIXMEs will
>> > definitely be dealt with. The images might be dealt with, if
>> > somebody deals with them.
>>
>> Bu
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:16 PM, "Nicolas Sceaux"
> wrote:
>
>>
>> According to R5RS, it is an error to modify a literal list.
>> If a function returns '(), the caller won't be allowed to
>> apply a modifying function on the result (eg. append!)
>>
>
> IIUC, '() is not a li
> Here is a patch that introduces a command line option aux-files,
> which can be used (-daux-files=#f, -dno-aux-files or #(ly:set-option
> 'no-aux-files)) to prevent lilypond's eps backend from creating
> .tex(i) and .count files:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/110107
>
> Okay to apply?
N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
since I'm currently using lilypond to create lots of small example files for a
larger thesis (written in Word), I'm using the eps backend to create nicely
clipped images. However, instead of one file per example, the eps backend
creates a .tex, a .t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:36:33AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Well, yes. FIXMEs generally aren't impressive. The FIXMEs will
> > definitely be dealt with. The images might be dealt with, if
> > somebody deals with them.
>
> But previously (info "(lilypond)") le
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:55:41AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> > Library based on sources from 20:49 GMT 30-Apr-2008.
>
> This is ooold. I've compiled the current CVS of FontForge by myself,
> and I don't see this (and I haven't see
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:36:33AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Well, yes. FIXMEs generally aren't impressive. The FIXMEs will
> > definitely be dealt with. The images might be dealt with, if
> > somebody deals with them.
>
> But previously (info "(lilypond)") le
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:16 PM, "Nicolas Sceaux"
wrote:
>
> According to R5RS, it is an error to modify a literal list.
> If a function returns '(), the caller won't be allowed to
> apply a modifying function on the result (eg. append!)
>
IIUC, '() is not a literal list, but a constant that rep
Le 27 août 09 à 22:38, Neil Puttock a écrit :
2009/8/26 Carl Sorensen :
The patch looks good to me.
Cheers.
You code the empty list as (list). I typically code the empty list
as '().
It there a preference? I suspect that we ought to be consistent,
although
it's not highly important.
Hi Trevor,
I wanted to take a minute to provide feedback on two LilyPond-oriented
presentations I was able to make earlier this year.
Congratulations, and "thanks" from the community!
Off-line, I'd be very interested in seeing a (tran)script of your
presentation(s): I'm scheduled to give som
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Reinhold
Kainhofer wrote:
>> - get_property_setting() should take SCMs rather than const char* , so
>> you save runtime lookups.
>
> I don't exactly understand what you mean by this... The two parameters of
> get_property_setting are passed on the get_property, whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 19:19:18 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> brief comments:
>
> - get_property_setting() should take SCMs rather than const char* , so
> you save runtime lookups.
I don't exactly understand what you mean by this... The two paramet
> I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually
> contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal
> error is printed.
They are contradictions, thus the internal error. It's a rounding
issue in FontForge.
> Executable based on sources from 00:29 GMT 29-Apr-2008.
> Libra
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, August 27, 2009 3:11 PM
After all, it is very easy to place the markup where you want it
by
simply using two spacer notes:
foo = {
s1
\time 7/8 s8^"foobar" s8*6
\time 10/8
}
OK, I haven't thought of that solution, thanks. This should
perhaps
be added to
15 matches
Mail list logo
