Mark Polesky wrote:
> So I'd like to add some more predicates to the alist.
I didn't really ask anything in the previous post. What I
meant to ask was: Are there any predicates here that I
*shouldn't* add to the alist? Any objections to including
all the "C++ predicates"? If no one objects, I'll
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:00 +0200, Michael Käppler wrote:
> Hmm...there's a new problem I don't understand.
> If I set a breakpoint in lily-parser.cc:225 (get_paper) and call
> normalize() from there, it seems that all "default" variables which are
> set in paper-defaults-init.ly aren't accessibl
In scm/lily.scm, the alist "type-p-name-alist" associates certain
type-predicates (eg. ly:music?) with strings (eg. "music") so that
type-check failures can be reported:
wrong type for argument 1. Expecting music, found 1.0
Any predicate that doesn't appear in the alist is assigned the
string
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 05:21:59PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > What do you think of the spacing? I'm not at all wild about the
> > "cannot see" part. Could you remove a bar or so, or maybe reduce
> > the font size, to give a wider
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
> >> Percival wrote:
> >> > Yes. Even though people say "oh, I'd li
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>> > Yes. Even though people say "oh, I'd like to help, but I don't
>> > want to use git", and I supply them with
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > Yes. Even though people say "oh, I'd like to help, but I don't
> > want to use git", and I supply them with a list of 7 or 8 things
> > they can do without git -- includ
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> Now the only missing examples are the orchestra one (for which we
>> might want a different image, anywa
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 05:18:13PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>
> Yes. Even though people say "oh, I'd like to help, but I don't
> want to use git", and I supply them with a list of 7 or 8 things
> they can do without git -
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Graham Percival <
> gra...@percival-music.ca>
> > wrote:
> > Now the only missing examples are the orchestra one (for which we
> > m
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> Now the only missing examples are the orchestra one (for which we
> might want a different image, anyway), plus any replacement pop or
> tablature ones. All of
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:45:17PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Neil. I've changed it so that it works now. Commented out the
> > system-count, added a \noBreak at the right spot, and changed the
> staffsize by
> > 1 point.
>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:45:17PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> Thanks, Neil. I've changed it so that it works now. Commented out the
> system-count, added a \noBreak at the right spot, and changed the staffsize by
> 1 point.
You forgot to uncomment the actual music, so it was creating a
glori
On 2009-08-14, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> >
> > See the attached patch for the progress I've made. Also attached is
> > an image of Mark Polesky's example from the bug tracker:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=379#
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/8/15 Jonathan Kulp :
>
> > So, did you fix the Granados or is it still broken? I tried running it on
> my
> > system and it had pages of errors that I don't even recognize. It works
> in
> > 2.12 without errors. I can't fix it right now.
2009/8/15 Neil Puttock :
> 458 /* ugr. This sux. */
> 459 string s (YYText ());
> 460 if (s == "__")
> 461 return yylval.i = EXTENDER;
> 462 if (s == "--")
> 463 return yylval.i =
2009/8/10 Thomas Morgan :
> I'm not aware of this (though I don't doubt that you're right).
> Could you give me an example?
See the attached image, which shows the change in output for the
regression test `chord-names-languages.ly'.
It's not a particularly serious issue, but there are likely to
On 8/15/09 1:43 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
> Op vrijdag 14-08-2009 om 23:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
>> BTW, why don't we want to credit texinfo and texi2html?
>
> - I would hardly want to advise others to use it. For me personally
>it is a maintenance nig
On 8/15/09 12:49 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 05:09:40 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 8/14/09 6:14 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
>>> Anyway, you don't mind about any subdir, right? In that case, I would
>>>
2009/8/15 Jonathan Kulp :
> So, did you fix the Granados or is it still broken? I tried running it on my
> system and it had pages of errors that I don't even recognize. It works in
> 2.12 without errors. I can't fix it right now. I'm not familiar with the
> spacing changes and dont' know where to
2009/8/14 Mark Polesky :
> I'm trying to get a better understanding of LilyPond the
> "programming language". Can someone look this over? Am I on the
> right track? As an example of some of the confusion I'm having,
> it seems to me that there are 3 categories of datatypes. That
> seems wrong, but
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 02:04:11PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op donderdag 13-08-2009 om 16:46 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> > Percival:
> >
> > > 3) Jan, please move web-gop/texinfo/examples/*.ly into
> > > master/Docu
2009/8/15 Mark Polesky :
> I know that \markup { ... } can be used within Lyrics,
> but are all LyricText objects actually stored as markup
> objects internally, even when not explicitly using the
> \markup command?
No, they're stored as scheme strings:
(lexer.ll)
457 {LYRICS} {
458
In
http://lilypond.org/web/switch/testimonials
The following links:
->
http://www.newyorkphilharmonic.org/meet/orchestra/index.cfm?page=profile&personNum=7
-> http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/rosegarden/
are 'dead'.
regards -- yotam
___
lilypond
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:43:39AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op vrijdag 14-08-2009 om 23:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
> > BTW, why don't we want to credit texinfo and texi2html?
>
> - Why is thanking texi2html more important than, say, bjarne stroustrup
>for cre
Op vrijdag 14-08-2009 om 23:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:01:18PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I would be tempted to generate the website in English first, and
> *then* work on the translation stuff.
That makes sense. I only wanted a sort of
26 matches
Mail list logo
