On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:12:34PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> As it turns out after discussing with Han-Wen, it seems that
> 2.12.2 was released from MASTER after stable/2.12 was branched.
> Don't ever do that! ;-)
Ok, I've added this to the CG.
> Also, I have regenerated the stable/2.12 b
Hi there,
I'm in the process of updating the openSUSE packages to 2.12.2
and spent quite some time finding out why it didn't build and
how changes in stable/2.12 came to be.
Today I was asked almost the same question by the Ubuntu packager.
Packagers still mostly release from tar balls instead of
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:07:30AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> The docs are specific to a given lilypond version, and should
>> therefore always be part of the main branch that contains the code.
>> The website is a a living 'document'
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:07:30AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The docs are specific to a given lilypond version, and should
> therefore always be part of the main branch that contains the code.
> The website is a a living 'document' that talks about several lilypond
> versions, and that chang
Sorry for cutting in so late on this topic.
I am not sure what problem this proposal is trying to solve. I am
against the idea of putting the website in the main code branch, for
the following reason:
The docs are specific to a given lilypond version, and should
therefore always be part of the ma
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:10 PM
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > > When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
> > >
> > > Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed,
Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 15:27 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
> > > Should we be adding a copy of favicon.ico to web/?
> >
> > We have not any references to favicon. Pages in either directory show
> > correcly their url icon
Yes, but that's because the new firefox first
tries .
Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:10 PM
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed,
and
identify the patches that caused the problem?
You can let
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 10:00 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> What do you mean by "dead"? If you mean "not being updated", then
> stable/2.12 isn't being updated anyway.
[checking]
$ git log release/2.12.2-1..origin/stable/2.12
10:03:54 jann...@peder:~/vc/lilypond-2.12
Op zondag 07-06-2009 om 17:12 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> After running
> make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
> there's nothing in downloads/libtiff/, causing
> make lilypond
> to fail:
Thanks, fixed in master.
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The
10 matches
Mail list logo
