On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> The "define" procedures are generally only available within a
>> single module "define-public" creates a sort of *global
>> procedure*; any module has access to it.
>
> Yes, but how would I access "list-minus"
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> The "define" procedures are generally only available within a
> single module "define-public" creates a sort of *global
> procedure*; any module has access to it.
Yes, but how would I access "list-minus", or "cons-map" from
another file if I wanted to? In lily-libra
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:17:58PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> In lily-library.scm, why are some procedures defined with
> "define-public" and some others only with "define"?
To the best of my understanding...
The "define" procedures are generally only available within a single
module (the Sc
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:35 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/5/24 Joe Neeman :
>
> > Fair enough, but I don't think 'padding has the right meaning here.
> > Ideally, 'padding should be the smallest distance between an
> > InstrumentName and the SystemStartXXX to its right. Here, it's the
> > dist
In lily-library.scm, why are some procedures defined with
"define-public" and some others only with "define"?
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Graham Percival :
> > Yes, that does sound too stupid. :) We already have the google
> > tracker. Don't re-invent the wheel.
>
> Thank you for the smiley.
Hey, you're the one that threw in the "too stupid" comment. I
2009/5/29 Graham Percival :
> Yes, that does sound too stupid. :) We already have the google
> tracker. Don't re-invent the wheel.
Thank you for the smiley.
>> Also, other B.T.S. have asignees per bug,
>
> "asignees" as in "Graham will work on this bug"? We can use the
> "owner" field for th
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 07:13:51PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Graham Percival :
> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:24:46PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >> can someone *please* have www_post.py insert an autogenerated marker
> >> there (and any others we missed?) like we do with most
2009/5/29 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:24:46PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> can someone *please* have www_post.py insert an autogenerated marker
>> there (and any others we missed?) like we do with most every generated
>> files?
>
> That's a good idea, but don't spend too lo
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> As a rule, whenever I find functions that are not defined in
> LilyPond's source, and not listed the Guile manual, I always
> check Guile's source code.
Ha! That's exactly what I tried, but with git.sv.gnu.org down, I
wasn't able to access it. But thanks for the explanati
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:57AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Why does this work? "symbol-append" is not listed in the guile
> manual, nor do I see it in the lilypond source. It was an accident
> that I discovered this at all, and subsequently I saw that it's
> implemented in MIT/GNU Scheme, b
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:24:46PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
can someone *please* have www_post.py insert an autogenerated marker
there (and any others we missed?) like we do with most every generated
files?
That's a good idea, but don't spend too long working on
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:24:46PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> can someone *please* have www_post.py insert an autogenerated marker
> there (and any others we missed?) like we do with most every generated
> files?
That's a good idea, but don't spend too long working on the
current webpages;
Dear list,
this seems to me a bug:
\version "2.12.2"
\score{\relative c'{
\time 3/4
r8
8
r4.
8
}}
results in the augmentation dot printed "behind" the accidental.
Both in 2.12 an 2.13 on this machine.
Best wishes, Arno http://www.nabble.com/file/p23781165/test3.pdf test3.
Op vrijdag 29-05-2009 om 13:09 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
> Hello, here is another web nitpick.
> instead. I'm afraid I do not know how to fix this on the htaccess file.
Me neither, but look at Documentation/index.html:
I found this file is generated by
scripts/bui
In message
, Han-Wen
Nienhuys writes
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sylvain Beucler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:07 AM
Subject: [Savannah-announce] Savannah outage
To: savannah-annou...@gnu.org
Hi,
Savannah experienced a filesystem corruption and is now halted.
The FSF sysad
LGTM
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need the attached patch to compile LilyPond.
>
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sylvain Beucler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:07 AM
Subject: [Savannah-announce] Savannah outage
To: savannah-annou...@gnu.org
Hi,
Savannah experienced a filesystem corruption and is now halted.
The FSF sysadmins (who have physical access to the har
Hello, here is another web nitpick.
The short links lilypond.org/doc and lilypond.org/documentation lead us to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/index.html
which is suboptimal, because it jumps over the automatic language
selection facility. It should be
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2
Why does this work? "symbol-append" is not listed in the guile
manual, nor do I see it in the lilypond source. It was an accident
that I discovered this at all, and subsequently I saw that it's
implemented in MIT/GNU Scheme, but *not* in guile. What's going
on? Are there other cool functions that
Mark Polesky wrote:
> ... I've ended up writing quite a few of
> these functions without knowing that they were all here.
Here's another useful set of procedures that is not in
lily-library.scm. These functions make quick work of calculating
offsets, extents, bounding-boxes, etc. I've attached a p
Thanks for reporting, there's a filesystem corruption at Savannah,
we'll probably have to restore from backup after investigating the
cause.
We alerted the FSF sysadmins so they can work on it.
--
Sylvain
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:15:44AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> looks like a glitch wi
22 matches
Mail list logo
