In message <20090409143812.ga4...@nagi>, Graham Percival
writes
Oh sweet $DIETY yes. I /hate/ it when people fix bugs in my code.
It's like, guys, I'm perfect, duh! Like, I added those "bugs" for
a reason!
Is that like abstaining from $CHOCOLATE?
Cheers,
Wol
--
Anthony W. Youngman - anth...
On 9 Apr 2009, at 06:04, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Programming standards for LilyPond call for avoiding the tab
character.
We're free to choose whatever programming conventions we want for
our source
code.
I don't think it is a standard, but I would not mind making it a
standard.
Some ye
2009/4/9 Graham Percival :
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> Now how do we prevent that in some far away future,
>> people will have forgotten this and propose to deviate from
>> the Zebra standard? I suggest to prefix all names in our
>> softwares in our to b
Le 7 avr. 09 à 23:28, Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
LilyPond programming standards call for no tabs in the files.
Wrong. All source files are "C-x h M-x tabify"ed.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:28:29PM -, dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
>
> AHA, we could consider beasts as drawn on old maps, whales, dolphins, lots
> of hoary depictions to choose from there, and all old enough to be PD.
DRAGON/LilyPond !!oneone!
"Here be engravers"
"Meddle not in the affai
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009, Jan Nieuwenhuizen said:
> No, but that's why I propose to first start our Zebra group and
> figure out coding standards. It's about time we got some, no?
coding standards, yes. But as to animals, we probably should contact
O'Reilly publicatinos and ask to be assigned one,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009, Graham Percival said:
> I can see it now: CARBON-BASED LIFEFORM WITH A RELATIVELY SHORT
> LIFESPAN ON THE COSMIC SCALE/LilyPond.
Apple deprecated Carbon development some years back.
My vote is BBEdit.
Lots of programming editors offer syntax coloration and formatting for
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:27:45PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 09-04-2009 om 22:14 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > Oh, certainly. But I think it would *also* be stupid to create a
> > programmer's edit, when vim is already perfect. :P
>
> True. Let's j
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Nah; Valentin will keep the legend of the Grumpy Developer alive
> in times to come. Long after humanity has colonized distant
> stars, schoolchildren will be reading about the epic flamewars
> involving Achilles, Trojan Horses, and wheth
Op donderdag 09-04-2009 om 22:14 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Oh, certainly. But I think it would *also* be stupid to create a
> programmer's edit, when vim is already perfect. :P
True. Let's just keep manually formatting everything. I mean,
people's tastes differ for a re
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> However, I think it would be stupid if we created a programmer's
> editor and then *not* have it default to our coding standards?
Oh, certainly. But I think it would *also* be stupid to create a
programmer's edit, when vim is al
Op donderdag 09-04-2009 om 20:01 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> See, I was with you until this point. Tying code indentation to a
> particular editor is... not ideal.
No, but that's why I propose to first start our Zebra group and
figure out coding standards. It's about time w
John Mangual wrote:
I would like to try my hand and fixing some Lilypond bugs. Is there a
beginners trail for this? Also I'd like to see locate the Lilypond source
on my Ubuntu computer and understand where some of the commands are defined.
The Contributor's Guide will show you how to get th
I would like to try my hand and fixing some Lilypond bugs. Is there a
beginners trail for this? Also I'd like to see locate the Lilypond source
on my Ubuntu computer and understand where some of the commands are defined.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:27:42AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> We could then maybe sponsor that group to create a programmer's editor
> --that would be something that everyone needs? We could make it
> automatically format the program code so that it adheres to that
> standard while you typ
Op donderdag 09-04-2009 om 09:53 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony
W. Youngman:
> Someone else will know more than me, but I think the linux kernel
> standards
What a good idea! But wait, maybe we can start or join join some kind
of "linux software group" and use their standards? Only soft
In message
, Han-Wen
Nienhuys writes
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
As to LY not accepting tabs, thats a shame, tabs should be treated as
white space, along with and other now-disused
characters from the days of teletypes which sometimes find their way into
ascii
Op donderdag 09-04-2009 om 01:04 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
> I don't think it is a standard, but I would not mind making it a standard.
Yes, I agree we should first make it a standard. It is is very
annoying if every project uses its own set of petty deviations.
Any takers
18 matches
Mail list logo
