1) What's the directory that contains lilypond.versions?
(alternately, what's the directory that contains the lilypond web
that creates the website)
If you're totally paranoid, go ahead an answer me privately, but I
really can't see how this could be a security risk.
(I've found one directory tha
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:14:23PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > I just realized that I probably should have modified the download
> > page, but I can't see any install-2.11.html or the like. What do
> > we normally do for developmen
Hi Graham,
Graham Percival a écrit :
I just realized that I probably should have modified the download
page, but I can't see any install-2.11.html or the like. What do
we normally do for development versions?
Patrick gave you the hint: just create a new download included page
install-2.13.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I just realized that I probably should have modified the download
> page, but I can't see any install-2.11.html or the like. What do
> we normally do for development versions?
Here are a couple of commits you could look at to see what hap
On 21 Mar 2009, at 09:32, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/20/09 9:36 PM, "Dan Eble" wrote:
On 20 Mar 2009, at 14:36, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I'd recommend
left-margin (which is never violated, i.e. it will always be at
least this
big, but may be bigger if the line is shorter and justif
I just realized that I probably should have modified the download
page, but I can't see any install-2.11.html or the like. What do
we normally do for development versions?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
On 3/20/09 9:36 PM, "Dan Eble" wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2009, at 14:36, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd recommend
>>
>> left-margin (which is never violated, i.e. it will always be at
>> least this
>> big, but may be bigger if the line is shorter and justification is
>> either
>> 'cente
I fixed the source dir for the download. Is the attached patch
the correct way to modify the website?
Cheers,
- Graham
>From 205249ddd5b4630d5a6c94ff7422f8d7cb876141 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Graham Percival
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:30:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Announce 2.13.0
---
site/
> I'm not top posting.
Hello John,
I am really sorry to reply too late. I am recently busy to get and prepare for
the new job.
I released the new patch for ja doc. It provides files for NR and some fixes.
http://irjb.s346.xrea.com/wiki/Patches+for+LilyPond+Document.html
Add "Documentation/ja/u
