On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, "James E. Bailey" wrote:
>
>
> On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
>>> the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
>>> last
>>> week)
>>
>> Yes, please do. C
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin writes:
Johannes> Unfortunately, it is that way in Open Source. But not
Johannes> only there... if you need a good quote by a famous
Johannes> author to say the same:
Johannes> So many people tut and say "Someone should do
Johannes>
Last month I sent a patch to the list dealing with lyric extenders.
Since it seems to have gotten lost in the deluge of list traffic, I'm
re-sending it, this time posting it on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/28052
Thanks,
-Chris
___
lilypond
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> as always, patches will be thoughtfully considered.
> >
> > It appears a bit disingenuous to me to answer "I can't figure out what
> > does what and why" with "congratulations, then it is your task to
> > figure this out to a degree where yo
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
last
week)
Yes, please do. Carl can help you get started as a Frog; we
desperately need more people writ
[forgot to CC to list]
- Forwarded message --
From: John Mandereau
Date: 2009/3/16
Subject: Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi Jan,
2009/3/16 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Your point about README/INSTALL is more difficult to tackle.
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
>> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
>> > this could be implemented with a \markup comma
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> as always, patches will be thoughtfully considered.
>
> It appears a bit disingenuous to me to answer "I can't figure out what
> does what and why" with "congratulations, then it is your task to figure
> this out to a degree where you can n
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:31:54AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
> I realise it's only been a week since this was last discussed, but:
> a) no one who can say whether or not this can be implemented has
> responded (ever)
Yes, this can be implemented.
I have no clue how complicated this may be,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
> > this could be implemented with a \markup command
>
> I don't like the idea o
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:47:28PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in
> 2.12.2. I have posted this on -user list but received little replies
> (only support) so it's time now to post on -devel.
I don't think anybody else has replied, so I'
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> 2009/3/16 David Kastrup :
>
>>> The problems with fixing a build system is that it is a major time
>>> sink without any obvious benefits,
>>
>> Well, one need not replace the innards. However, adapting the names of
>> the basic targets and what they do should be reason
2009/3/16 David Kastrup :
>> The problems with fixing a build system is that it is a major time
>> sink without any obvious benefits,
>
> Well, one need not replace the innards. However, adapting the names of
> the basic targets and what they do should be reasonably easy.
as always, patches will
On 16.03.2009, at 10:45, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/3/16 James E. Bailey :
3) Is there a way to get a half of a box around a fingering? I
vaguely
remember a three-legged box in the markup commands, but I don't
see it
anymore. Any tips for where to look?
Search for the word Three in LSR
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Op zaterdag 14-03-2009 om 15:31 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David
> Kastrup:
>
>> If compiling Lilypond from source with default
>> settings means not getting the full docs, this is what all major
>> distributions will distribute
>
> So what we need to change is for
Op zaterdag 14-03-2009 om 15:31 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David
Kastrup:
> If compiling Lilypond from source with default
> settings means not getting the full docs, this is what all major
> distributions will distribute
So what we need to change is for
make [all|default]
to also make w
2009/3/16 James E. Bailey :
>
> 3) Is there a way to get a half of a box around a fingering? I vaguely
> remember a three-legged box in the markup commands, but I don't see it
> anymore. Any tips for where to look?
Search for the word Three in LSR:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=330
--
Fra
I'm guessing it's a bad time to ask questions, I haven't seen much
response, but I thought I'd ask again.
1) I know it's difficult to imagine that a user (i.e., not someone
who can fix a bug) has properly set up his system for convert-ly on
osx 10.4, but convert-ly on osx 10.4 does not work
18 matches
Mail list logo
