documentation link to big page broken

2009-02-11 Thread Frédéric Bron
This link has been broken for a few days: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-big-page F. Bron ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-11 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:49:31PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On wo, 2009-02-11 at 11:22 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Hmm. I'm running a 32-bit OS and have 32-bit hardware. But gmp > > compiled successfully after your fix though. > > Interesting. What's the output of cat /proc/cpu

Re: which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Hopefully it is really caused by the rounding errors Werner > mentioned. Definitely. George says that he fights a never-ending battle :-) Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp

Re: which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Maximilian Albert
2009/2/11 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : >> while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see >> lots of fontforge whinings like this one: > >> Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed and >> unneeded. > > Indeed, these glyphs were recently added and seem to hav

Re: which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On wo, 2009-02-11 at 22:41 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > I'm currently using a CVS version dated 2009-Jan-23, and I don't get a > single warning. Great, I'll update GUB then. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http

Re: which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On wo, 2009-02-11 at 22:25 +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: Hi Matthias, > while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see > lots of fontforge whinings like this one: > Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed and > unneeded. Indeed, these glyphs we

Re: which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see > lots of fontforge whinings like this one: [...] > > > What (hopefully newer) version fontforge is typically used for > lilypond? I'm currently using a CVS version dated 2009-Jan-23, and I don't get a single warning. > And: do

which fontforge version?

2009-02-11 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, while working on an update of the openbsd port of lilypond, i see lots of fontforge whinings like this one: Invoking "fontforge -script feta13.pe feta13.pfb"... Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008. Library based on sources from

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On wo, 2009-02-11 at 11:22 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hmm. I'm running a 32-bit OS and have 32-bit hardware. But gmp > compiled successfully after your fix though. Interesting. What's the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo? > Now GUB halts at tools::libjpeg. Attached is the end of my build.log.

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-11 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > So, gcc -m32 is trying to link to a 64 bit library. That does not work. > > I see that ABI=32, so I assume that you run a 32 bit OS on 64 bit > hardware? Hmm. I'm running a 32-bit OS and have 32-bit hardware. But gmp compil