> > This patch fixes `make web'. Can someone apply it?
>
> ...but it didn't fix `make all'. Sorry about the early post.
>
> This revised patch should fix the issue.
Applied, thanks.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.or
> In several places, but not all, you replaced the text
>
> Default 1.0.
>
> with the text
>
> defa...@tie{}1.0.
>
> I understand that the @tie{} is there to prevent the 1.0 from being wrapped
> onto a line by itself.
>
> Is there a reason that you didn't do it on all of them, or was it just
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:15:02PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch fixes `make web'. Can someone apply it?
...but it didn't fix `make all'. Sorry about the early post.
This revised patch should fix the issue.
Thanks,
Patrick
>From a575f79ba61c6c4f84f23e9a8bf8c8e26a9d0ac2
Hello,
This patch fixes `make web'. Can someone apply it?
Thanks,
Patrick
>From c64f776177d23dabd9ffe28ed2aac7dcf0240fc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:10:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile
Signed-off-by: Patrick McCarty
---
Documentation/devel/do
On 1/15/09 5:18 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Anne Ghisla wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
>
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
> organization, and other vital things. So I say that Carl would be
> an ideal
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was
documentation-only, and I imagine other projects had as well.
> A full list of possible projects is on the google issue
On 1/15/09 5:08 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:41:20PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> Any plans to release 2.12.2 soon?
>
> I'd love to, but I still can't build it.
Can I, or somebody else, do the build for you?
> Also, I get 30% packet
> loss from my apartment
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Anne Ghisla wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
>>
>>> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
>>
>> But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Depends on what it is. I'm an excellent mentor for documentation,
and I'd really l
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:41:20PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> Any plans to release 2.12.2 soon?
I'd love to, but I still can't build it. Also, I get 30% packet
loss from my apartment at peak times (8pm to 12 pm), so ssh to
kainhofer is unbearable. :/
There's a research group meeting on Sa
Werner,
I was reviewing your documentation improvements patch 3e7adc...
In several places, but not all, you replaced the text
Default 1.0.
with the text
defa...@tie{}1.0.
I understand that the @tie{} is there to prevent the 1.0 from being wrapped
onto a line by itself.
Is there a reason tha
Graham,
Any plans to release 2.12.2 soon?
I've added a new orientation and variable string thickness to fret diagrams,
which was requested by some users. I'd like to be able to tell them it's
available.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 15.01.2009 (16:43), Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After 2.12 I decided to do my small round checking of distributions
> again (should we add something like this to release tasks?).
>
> Fedora already has 2.12 (yay!), while Debian and Ubuntu already had 2.12
> wishlist bugs filed (great
> I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
> lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings.
What exactly do you mean?
> I would think the reason those problems haven't been fixed is that
> it's more than a few hours to do it, but I would really be surprised
> if it wer
> And last but not least: what about our own documentation builds?
> Info docs are missing here altogether! Should we include info docs
> and re-root the documentation ball to look like
>
>share/doc/lilypond/Documentation/*
>share/info/dir
>share/info/*
I'm all for it.
Werner
I'm trying to package lilypond for MacPorts. (I am aware that there is a
fink package, but I prefer MacPorts to fink.) When I try to compile the
sources, I'm getting an error that I really don't understand:
/opt/local/bin/perl
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_tmp_textproc_lilypond/work/lilypon
Laura Conrad writes:
> I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
> lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings. I would think the
> reason those problems haven't been fixed is that it's more than a few
> hours to do it, but I would really be surprised if it were more
Johannes Schindelin ha scritto:
(unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Why? Are there no other mentor candidates except Han-Wen? I can say that
I'm quite independent :) and the students are allowed to consult the
develope
I'd especially like someone to look at some of the problems with
lilypond-book. Particularly the margin settings. I would think the
reason those problems haven't been fixed is that it's more than a few
hours to do it, but I would really be surprised if it were more than
two months.
--
Laura
Hi,
After 2.12 I decided to do my small round checking of distributions
again (should we add something like this to release tasks?).
Fedora already has 2.12 (yay!), while Debian and Ubuntu already had 2.12
wishlist bugs filed (great!), but none of the major distributions
manages to provide pro
I don't know if this is a pie in the sky, but the gregorian notation system
could use a caring hand, especially the spacing stuff.
Eyolf
On 15.01.2009 (13:45), Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
>
> (unfort
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
That would be nice.
> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Ciao,
Dscho
P
Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
music streams infrastructure.
(unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Sch
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > > > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> > > > > I think we can be under t
Op donderdag 15-01-2009 om 22:17 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
Hi Graham,
> Why did you add an rsync dependency for the docs? For uploading
> the docs, I'd understand, but for simply building them...?
make web-install (and also make test) uses rsync. I found out
trying to buil
Anne Ghisla wrote:
Hello all,
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
I think we can be under the umbrella of FSF/GNU.
Can the mentor be a FSF/GNU mentor, or does there need t
Hi Jan,
Why did you add an rsync dependency for the docs? For uploading
the docs, I'd understand, but for simply building them...?
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
looks fine. Did the problems appear here, or are they in the original
change too?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:10 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:58 -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> > Just looking at your fix for #59 - have yo
Hello all,
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we can be under the umbrella of FSF/GNU.
> >
> > Can the mentor be a FSF/GNU mentor, or does there need
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Anne Ghisla gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I started working with LilyPond some time ago and I am impressed of
>> its high quality output and richness of features. I was wondering if
>> I could propose a project for Google Summer of Code [1], since I have
>> participated last y
29 matches
Mail list logo
