Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

> Any other thoughts? Any chance Neil's "double repeat sign" patch can be approved for 2.12? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-09/msg00084.html - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gn

Re: Add a ly:line-thickness callback for scheme, returning the line thickness

lgtm http://codereview.appspot.com/5073 ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

On 2008/09/20 18:49 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > Forgot something: we should probably add warnings in the docs (or the > download page) about the sorry state of OSX. > 10.4 and 10.3: broken lilypond-book and convert-ly. The broken > convert-ly is particularly unfortunate given the syntax chang

Re: Brazilian Translation

Hi Benno, hi Marcos, On 2008/09/20 22:57 -0300, Marcos di Silva wrote: > Mandereau, > > I finished translating Lilypond to pt_BR some months ago. I sent > disclaimer to FSF, but until now they didn't update the list of > translators. Could I send PO file? Do I have to wait my name in the > list o

Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

On 2008/09/21 02:30 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:56:47 +0200 > "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - and possibly mention the fact that we have changed (simplified) the > > syntax quite a bit? > > Again, I had that initially, but removed it due to length >

Re: Translations status

On 2008/09/21 22:23 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > John, do you want me to push from now on the generated translations > status whenever some file gets updated? Of course. Every translator may update translations status, that's why it's documented in TRANSLATION ;-) Cheers, John __

* Use scm_to_int64/from_int64 for Rational/SCM conversions.

Reviewers: Neil Puttock, Message: LGTM - this is what I meant. http://codereview.appspot.com/5889/diff/1/6 File lily/moment.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5889/diff/1/6#newcode134 Line 134: { If you want to be paranoid, you could check that the most significant bit is 1 here. Descr

Re: Use 'long long' integers in Rational class.

2008/9/19 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > They appear if you use -Wall with compiling lilypond. I'm on fedora > 9, which has a pretty recent gcc though. That's the default setting though, isn't it? I'm on Ubuntu hardy x86_64, using gcc 4.2.3; the only warnings I've ever seen are from the

Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

2008/9/21 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Let me put it this way: when you read an announcement of a new > release in some other software (say, audacity or freeciv), how > much do you want to read? My guess is less than a page of text. > The current release is two pages. It definitely sho

Re: Add a ly:line-thickness callback for scheme, returning the line thickness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > http://codereview.appspot.com/5073/diff/601/403 > File lily/staff-symbol-referencer-scheme.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5073/diff/601/403#newcode41 > Line 41: LY_DEFINE (ly_li

Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:56:47 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rune was a computer programmer, a musician and a valued > contributor to LilyPond. He had been enthusiastically involved > in the project for the past six years, and he will be missed among > our community. Tha

Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12

2008/9/21 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Waiting for Valentin to fill in info about Rune. Yes, I haven't forgotten, though I really don't know what to say. I'd propose something very neutral based on what you gave me, such as: We are proud to announce the release of GNU/LilyPond 2.12 "