Re: NR 4

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No one is working on NR 4 at the moment and, as it is not an area I'm > familiar with, I'd be very grateful if you could work on it. Thanks for the > offer :) > > I'll copy to -dev to let others know. Okay, thanks. I w

Re: Code review tool?

I did one. Can you guys make sure that lilypond-devel is on the CC list? (I punted on Nic's for now, as I'm at work, and it's a really large change.) On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/9 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> As a test, I did one:

Use 'long long' integers in Rational class.

Reviewers: Neil Puttock, Message: LGTM . I wonder if we should have a typedef long long, though. Maybe int64 or similar. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5058 Affected files: M flower/include/rational.hh M flower/include/std-string.hh M flower/include/string-conver

Re: Code review tool?

2008/9/9 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As a test, I did one: > (but it's real code to be reviewed!) I've also done a trial run: http://codereview.appspot.com/5058 Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: NR 4

No one is working on NR 4 at the moment and, as it is not an area I'm familiar with, I'd be very grateful if you could work on it. Thanks for the offer :) I'll copy to -dev to let others know. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Trevor Dan

Re: Code review tool?

Le 9 sept. 08 à 16:42, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : Hi guys, What do you think of using codereview.appspot for code reviews? http://neugierig.org/software/git/index.cgi?url=git-cl/tree/README (for example: http://codereview.appspot.com/4847) As a test, I did one:

Re: Code review tool?

On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:42 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Hi guys, > > What do you think of using codereview.appspot for code reviews? Looks good. It would be nice if it didn't default to git-svn head, though. Actually, I see that they have some TODOs in their source regarding this... Joe

Re: Feature request: more repeat signs

2008/9/8 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/9/4 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Yes. You'd just have to override the default setting for >> doubleRepeatType to use the new styles automatically. > > Sorry to pester you again with this nice new feature... > > Im' sure the automatic v

Re: documentation addition (tremolo beams)

2008/9/9 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Valentin, can you add this as a snippet, or shall we wait until Seba gets > back? I'll happily add it to the LSR once it's up again (within two weeks, says Seba). Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-devel mail

Fw: different tempi

Since I got zero responses on lilypond-user, I'm forwarding this email to the developers' list. The problem is a real showstopper for me. From a certain bar within my piece, the viola plays freely, using different bar lines and time signatures, and I can't find a solution how to get this in lily

Code review tool?

Hi guys, What do you think of using codereview.appspot for code reviews? http://neugierig.org/software/git/index.cgi?url=git-cl/tree/README (for example: http://codereview.appspot.com/4847) Basicallly, I did the following: $ git cl config Rietveld server (host[:port]) [codereview.appspot.com]

Re: lilypond-book in 2.11.57

On 2008/08/31 11:12 -0400, Laura Conrad wrote: > When I run "lilypond-book --pdf sonate.lytex", I get: > > Running lilypond...GNU LilyPond 2.10.33 > Fontconfig error: Cannot load default config file > > Note that this is the wrong version of lilypond -- 2.10.33 is > installed systemwide