On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:20:36 +0100
"Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > REMAINING ISSUES
> > - ... is there *anything* else? I don't want to discover a new
> > issue in two weeks. Let's get this stuff nailed down now.
>
> \center-align -> \center-column?
>
> As Mats has said, it's inc
Thanks for the report. Is this typo present in the 2.11 docs? I
can't see it. Please note that the 2.11 docs have been almost
completely rewritten since 2.10.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:30:36 + (UTC)
Tomas Szaniszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is most probably a typo
Hi Graham!
May I object that the naming of the paragraph dealing about "simulating
a fermata" in tweaks.itely (section further tweaking), is totally wrong,
since the glyph is printed AND rendered in the MIDI output? It should
rather be, in my opinion, something like "performing a fermata".
C
There is most probably a typo in manual section '2.5.6 How to read the
manual' in the second paragraph. The last sentence
---
we have explicitly stated our \relative our our absolute-mode { }.
---
has too many our-s, however, it doesn't seem clear to me, what was its
intended wording. It could be
2008/7/12 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I really think we should announce a beta version ahead of 2.12, but we
> can't do this until we're certain all the syntax is taken care of.
>
> REMAINING ISSUES
> - whatever \octave thing Valentin was going on about. Neil, could
> you look into thi
