Re: Arg still having problems with the gub build

Hi, On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Mark Hanlon wrote: > I run everything as root. > Here's what I do: > mkdir gub > cd gub > git init > git pull git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git gub: Note that this will not set up automatic merge information, so that "git pull" without further arguments does no

Re: [PATCH] RSS feed on lilypond.org

2008/6/1 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Speaking of news, Evolution plugin "News and blogs" I use to read RSS > feeds doesn't manage to update the one from lilypond.org. Has anybody > expeienced problem with lilypond.org RSS feed? Would that happen > because old entries are deleted in the

Re: [PATCH] RSS feed on lilypond.org

On 2008/06/01, Valentin Villenave wrote: > I'm not completely familiar with the new system, can you please review > this patch and apply it if it's ok? It's OK modulo the date I fixed. The date parser is a bit silly you know, and the guy that decided to use it on lilypond.org is a bit lazy :-p S

Re: [PATCH] RSS feed on lilypond.org

2008/5/19 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >Speaking of, Valentin, are you sure you want to delete >> > old entries for LilyPond report? If you fear they make release items >> > disappear too quickly, I can easily hack make-news.py so that it selects >> > the right 4 entries to be displa

Arg still having problems with the gub build

Hello everyone, I'm still having problems with doing the gub lilypond build. I decided to start from scratch, delete everything, and start again. I'm now getting even less far than before :) Awesome, I'm a great developer! I run everything as root. Here's what I do: mkdir gub cd gub git i

Re: texi2html status

On 2008/05/31, I wrote: > OK, so I'm going to start the makefile brain-surgery so we have 3 WWW > stages, I'll push to dev/texi2html when it works. Done. As positive side effects, it's now possible to build docs only in PDF and Info (by issuing 'make web-1'), and the strange make loop which somet

Re: Fw: Sustain in midi output of Piano Centered Dynamics Template

It wasn't me; I just reminded somebody to work on it. If this uses 2.11 stuff (which I imagine it does, given the new dynamic stuff), then you should update input/new/piano-template-...ly Changes won't appear until Neil runs makelsr.py, but there isn't any urgency for this. Cheers, - Graham On

Fw: Sustain in midi output of Piano Centered Dynamics Template

Valentin Graham fixed most of the problems with the centered piano dynamics template recently, but missed this request. Can I just add this in git or should I use lsr update? Trevor - Original Message - From: "Oscar van Eijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Trevor

Re: Bugtracker cleanup/update

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:33:56 +0200 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's almost sure that there won't be one person alone left that will > have enough time and energy to do as much as you do, but I hope we are > enough people to be able to make GDP live for a few months after > you've g

Re: Bugtracker cleanup/update

On 2008/05/31, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:28:50 +0200 > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > An unsure question is, should big doc work like GDP go on on master > > after 2.12? > > No, because barring a miracle, there won't be anybody[1] left to do > big doc work.

Re: Bugtracker cleanup/update

On 2008/05/30, Graham Percival wrote: > Slight update from my "you'd have to be crazy..." comment: how > about we have a two-month "beta releases" period? We're > occasionally criticized for not doing this anyway, and if the code > is stable but the docs need more work, calling it a "beta" sounds

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 00:07 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What if you change __x86__ to __i386__? (Sorry to turn you into a guinea > > pig, but I don't have an array of different x86 configurations at my > > disposal)

Re: Detailed plan for documentation translations

On 2008/05/31, Graham Percival wrote: > > unfretted-strings.itely > > fretted-strings.itely > > Could be changes to these. I told people to work on subsections > inside the existing structure, but that we could discuss > rearranging them further after they're done. > > > percussion.itely > > win

Re: Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if you change __x86__ to __i386__? (Sorry to turn you into a guinea > pig, but I don't have an array of different x86 configurations at my > disposal). Great! Changing it to __i386__ works for me. Thanks a lot, Joe!