On 2008/05/30, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> The main problem, already explained by John: Since we will have multiple
> subsections in one file, the links won't be that easy, because you can no
> longer defer the file name from the link name. So I suppose, there would need
> to be a first run with
On 2008/05/31, Neil Puttock wrote:
> The issue seems to be the lack of 'word-space: the function in
> markup.scm, which is used by \line, is expecting a value for
> 'word-space which doesn't exist, resulting in failure.
Good catch! :-)
> Markup which doesn't rely on 'word-space works fine, e.g \
2008/5/30 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/5/30 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Then, from a bugs perspective, we are ready to release 2.12.
>
> I know there are workarounds, but the winner from user's point of view
> seems to be #504 'Leopard', it is starred by 16 people (others
On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:26:50 +0100
"Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A simple fix would be to add a default for 'word-space to
> VoltaBracket. Would anybody object if I push this fix (with an
> input/new snippet for demonstration)?
One general comment:
- input/regression/ are for bug-f
2008/5/30 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Then, from a bugs perspective, we are ready to release 2.12.
I know there are workarounds, but the winner from user's point of view
seems to be #504 'Leopard', it is starred by 16 people (others are by
a maximum of 2, I think) Despite of the workar
2008/5/30 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe something like
>
> \set Score.repeatCommands = #(list (list 'volta (markup
> #:line (#:simple "1.2.3..." #:roman (#:italic "ad lib." 'end-repeat)
>
> or an equivalent form
>
> voltaAdLib = \markup { "1.2.3..." \roman \italic "ad lib." }
>
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm... I actually preferred your original names. Although I *do*
> like the \dimAs{Decresc/decr/dim}, since it links back to the \<
> \> concept (ie decresc/decr/dim are all interally the same).
Yes, I like how Trevor
On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:21:54 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, from a bugs perspective, we are ready to release 2.12.
Slight update from my "you'd have to be crazy..." comment: how
about we have a two-month "beta releases" period? We're
occasionally criticized for not d
On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:21:54 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The status is that we have 97 defects left, of which one regression,
> and one marked high. After fixing these, I'll go through the list once
> more to pick the low-hanging fruit.
Speaking of low-hanging fruit, how
On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:15:17 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > 2) Are there any remaining technical issues with our build system
> > (ie translations)?
>
> One thing, wh
On Fri, 30 May 2008 12:38:43 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Trevor Daniels
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think is this too complicated. For crescendos there are just
> > two possibilities - cresc. or hairpins - and for decrescendos
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think is this too complicated. For crescendos there are just
> two possibilities - cresc. or hairpins - and for decrescendos
> there are four - decresc., decr., dim or hairpin. That is, six
> altogether, so why do w
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Renaming \setTextCresc, \setHairpinCresc, etc.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/30 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:43:59 -0700
>> Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to propose that we rename the textual crescendo and
>>> decrescendo
Graham Percival schrieb:
On Thu, 29 May 2008 01:15:12 +0200
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/5/28 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Till, Francisco,
would you like to do a part of this work?
Count on me, but my GDP contributions will slow down (even more!).
Francisco Vila schrieb:
2008/5/28 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Till, Francisco,
would you like to do a part of this work?
Count on me, but my GDP contributions will slow down (even more!).
Graham will complain. This month is terrible for me, and summer is
always uncertain. Ple
Le vendredi 30 mai 2008 à 18:31 +0200, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
> 2008/5/30 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > This won't work, because \markup is a LilyPond command, so it doesn't
> > work within Scheme; you should use something like
> > (markup #:line (#:simple "blablah"))
>
> > Mayb
2008/5/30 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This won't work, because \markup is a LilyPond command, so it doesn't
> work within Scheme; you should use something like
> (markup #:line (#:simple "blablah"))
> Maybe explaining Scheme language features used in this example is
> probably not relev
2008/5/30 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for this work, Valentin!
>
> The status is that we have 97 defects left, of which one regression,
> and one marked high. After fixing these, I'll go through the list once
> more to pick the low-hanging fruit. Then, from a bugs perspective, w
On 2008/05/29, Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
> I noticed that the LP front page states that "LilyPond now allows all
> text context properties to be markups". This does not yet cover volta
> brackets, though. That is Score.repeatCommands, which only accepts
> plain text. If you try to enter a markup the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> What's the status of the texi2html output?
>
> 1) Are there any remaining bugs or missing features in texi2html
> that we'd like to see?
Not that I'm aware of. Of course, there remain some issues
Thanks for this work, Valentin!
The status is that we have 97 defects left, of which one regression,
and one marked high. After fixing these, I'll go through the list once
more to pick the low-hanging fruit. Then, from a bugs perspective, we
are ready to release 2.12.
What's that status for the
2008/4/30 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:43:59 -0700
> Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose that we rename the textual crescendo and
>> decrescendo commands to names that are more intuitive and are more
>> internally consistent. The
I have also tried building using GUB as some point in time. Worked
without any major
problems as far as I can remember.
/Mats
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
You realize that you are probably the first or second person beyond me &
Jan to bui
2008/5/28 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Valentin,
Hi,
> However, to be sure that there are no gaping bugs left, we should go
> over the bugtracker before 2.12 is released.
I have processed all non-Accepted issues, and all Accepted issues
older than a year. I have also verified recen
25 matches
Mail list logo
