Re: c:maj inconsistency

Hi On 19. mai. 2008, at 00:31, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Right now, :maj adds a major 7th step, even if no number is present. c:maj is equivalent to c:maj7. That is the confusion. Agree IMHO, by making c:maj equal to c, we would make c:maj7 (and friends) less clear. By just disallowing c:

RE: c:maj inconsistency

> -Original Message- > From: Erlend Aasland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:23 AM > To: Carl D. Sorensen > Cc: Graham Percival; lily-devel > Subject: Re: c:maj inconsistency > > Hi Carl > > On 18. mai. 2008, at 11:56, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > >> Hmmm, since c:maj

Re: GDP: Markup command snippets - trial run

On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:24:45 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I trust you've had a look at B.6 with my snippet additions; I think > you'll agree that it's not a pretty sight. :) Actually, I haven't see any updates in a few weeks. Have you been sending patches to Valentin? I can

Re: binary for Leopard available

Hi, could these intel binaries to me? Or maybe place it on some website so I could download it? thanks Arthur Reutenauer escreveu: Hello, Jeroen Bol sent me a working binary for Mac OS X Leopard, which he created by changing the Python part of the GUI. As I mentioned a whi

Re: c:maj inconsistency

Hi Carl On 18. mai. 2008, at 11:56, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Hmmm, since c:maj is ambiguous, I think it's better to just disallow c:maj without the 7. […] This proposed solution gets a little tricky when we talk about a c:maj9, which creates a five-note chord with a raised 7th step. No probl

Re: [PATCH] Scheme function ly:string->duration

2008/5/18 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, I was under the mistaken impression that sscanf returned the > number of characters that were converted. But given that there's a > scheme function that already does this (should have read the whole > conversation first...) I agree with Nicolas th

GDP: Markup command snippets - trial run

Graham, I trust you've had a look at B.6 with my snippet additions; I think you'll agree that it's not a pretty sight. :) Several snippets are suffering from the PNG cropping bug (even in the PDF output), so unless that can be fixed, it's probably preferable to have musical examples for the major

Infinite loop with GCC 4.3

Hi, I just installed Fedora 9 on my x86 (32 bits) laptop, which comes with gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8). I can compile LilyPond binary succesfully, but running it on any input file makes it hang on an infinite loop, most often after Preprocessing graphical objects; every Control-C i

Avoiding typing with Scheme - request

Hello guys, first of all, i have to congratulate for you Lilypond, I used some other composition softwares, but this leave those in the dust... of course, learning the 'programming language' took me some time LOL To the point: I've noticed a very useful trick in the Documentation with Scheme: pat

RE: c:maj inconsistency

> -Original Message- > From: Erlend Aasland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 3:03 AM > To: Graham Percival > Cc: lily-devel; Carl D. Sorensen > Subject: Re: c:maj inconsistency > > Hmmm, since c:maj is ambiguous, I think it's better to just > disallow c:maj without t

Re: c:maj inconsistency

Hmmm, since c:maj is ambiguous, I think it's better to just disallow c:maj without the 7. E On 18. mai. 2008, at 00:43, Graham Percival wrote: Exerpt from Chords: --- maj The major 7th chord. This modifier adds a raised 7th step. The 7 following maj is optional. Do NOT use this modifier to