python style

2008-04-25 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi John, you added some scripts to buildscripts/ recently. Some of them don't follow coding style. Can you fix that? The 8 space indent is the main problem (it should be 4) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

2008-04-25 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2008/4/25 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > John: I'm sorry for the breakage. I have removed the property > definition. > > > > > > Han-Wen: Do you mean these properties are not associated with any grob? > > > > > > > > > > Properties are usually associated with interfaces. - we don't hav

Re: [PATCH] note-by-number - horizontal flag positioning

2008-04-25 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2008/4/25 Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I've included a patch that should be applied on top of the one > Valentin already applied. Thanks, applied. For the future, could you use a slightly more descriptive message for your commits? Thanks! -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: GDP: Broken links

2008-04-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:34:15 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A check of the html links which cross-reference between AU, LM and NR > showed around a dozen links that were incorrect. Some of these were > broken (gave 404s), but at least one linked into an obsolete page > which

GDP: Broken links

2008-04-25 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham, John A check of the html links which cross-reference between AU, LM and NR showed around a dozen links that were incorrect. Some of these were broken (gave 404s), but at least one linked into an obsolete page which actually displayed correctly in the docs on kainhofer.com! I don't un

(patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position

2008-04-25 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Dear All, In current LP version the \note and \note-by-number put augmentation dots very close to the flags. Sometimes they even collide. On the other hand if the stem length is increased the dots are not moved any closer to the stem, i.e., under the flags. I made a small experiment with the dots

Re: lybook-db and make xxx-clean

2008-04-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe Neeman wrote: > > It seems that some changes in the way lilypond-books output is stored > > have broken certain build rules, particularly ones that clean stuff. > > For example, > > > > $ make check > > $ make test-c

Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}

2008-04-25 Thread John Mandereau
On 24/04/2008, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:38:50 +0200 > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, no -- I'm saying that I don't think it's worth linking to a > specific snippet. As long as people are directed to the Foo > snippet list, that's all we need. The extra com

Re: lybook-db and make xxx-clean

2008-04-25 Thread John Mandereau
Joe Neeman wrote: > It seems that some changes in the way lilypond-books output is stored > have broken certain build rules, particularly ones that clean stuff. > For example, > > $ make check > $ make test-clean > $ time make check > real0m31.410s > user0m25.598s > sys0m4.084s > $ mak

percussion definition

2008-04-25 Thread alistair zaldua
Dear all, I was curious to know whether it was possible to set up and define a percussion clef from scratch. After having looked at drumpitch-init.ly , the manual, and after a few try-outs, I understand that depending on what style I chose, i.e. "drums-style", I have to place the instruments on

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

2008-04-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: 2008/4/22 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2008/4/22 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: FWIW, I usually leave out documentation for markup-specific > properties. You could put them in the doc string of the markup > command. John: I'm

Re: [PATCH] note-by-number - horizontal flag positioning

2008-04-25 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
2008/4/24 Han-Wen Nienhuys : > little shorter > > (cons (+ (car attach-off) (if (> dir 0) stem-thickness 0)) > .. ) Much more elegant, thanks. :-) However, in this case the (> dir 0) should be reversed: (cons (+ (car attach-off) (if (< dir 0) stem-thickness 0)) stemy) I've included a pa