Attempting to build the docs on the GDP server fails in
Documentation/topdocs/
on version.itexi. I can't reproduce this on my OSX laptop; did
something change between texinfo 4.11 (my laptop) and the
pre-release texinfo 4.12 on GDP?
I'm not certain whether I should be asking Reinhold or John ab
On 17/04/2008, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:09:35 +0200
>
> "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > OK. Graham, I did implement something that could be useful -- or not.
> > It's not very elegant, but at least it doesn't break anything.
> >
>
Valentin Villenave wrote:
> OK. Graham, I did implement something that could be useful -- or not.
> It's not very elegant, but at least it doesn't break anything.
>
> Here's a patch, in case you'd like to check it out:
> http://valentin.villenave.info/lilypond/new_markup_docs.patch
>
> Here's wha
Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2008/4/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I guess that if you want to translate everything,
>
> I do. You cannot imagine how English can the docs look if something is
> in English ;)
LOL!
> There are three types of in-snippet translations: comments, text,
>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:09:35 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. Graham, I did implement something that could be useful -- or not.
> It's not very elegant, but at least it doesn't break anything.
>
> Here's what it looks like (look at the appendix):
> http://valentin.ville
Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 12:07 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit :
> Am Dienstag, 8. April 2008 schrieb John Mandereau:
> Well, for references within the same document, everything works fine (as
> texi2html keeps a hash of node<=>filename#ID assignments anyway). However,
> for cross-references f
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> -D "VAR VALUE" is not supported, though (it works in makeinfo only by
> accident
> and is not officially supported there, either).
Fixed in master and /dev/texi2html. I guess the new mechanism will also
work better with Graham's configuration ;-)
Cheers,
John
__
2008/4/6 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey, scheme guys: how hard would it be to introduce our own sorting to
> B.6 ? scm/document-markup.scm contains this:
[...]
> which sorts things alphabetically. Could we instead group things by
> function... ideally with our own headings? ie
2008/4/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I guess that if you want to translate everything,
I do. You cannot imagine how English can the docs look if something is
in English ;)
> you'll *have*
> to translate a large number of lilypond code as well. This
> strikes me as an ineffici
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:35:53 +0200
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/16, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Difficult to do without using lots of @code{propertyNames} in the
> > main text. In this case, I'd rather keep the explanation in the
> > code.
>
> Regarding to
10 matches
Mail list logo
