On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:11:08 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The 87 .eps files were produced by 25 .ly files (ie some files
> > produced -1 -2 -3.eps files, all still over 1 meg). I've attached
> > the list... sorry a
2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Sure!
>
> The 87 .eps files were produced by 25 .ly files (ie some files
> produced -1 -2 -3.eps files, all still over 1 meg). I've attached
> the list... sorry about the final quote, I couldn't figure out how
> to get `cut' to remove charac
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:41:02 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > That looks like it. 87 .eps files are over 1M, while the other
> > 1481 are under 300K. I checked a few of the corresponding .ly
> > files, and they all have \
I'm not totally certain about these names, so I thought I'd ask for
other recommendations.
expandRestBars = {
\set Score.skipBars = ##f
}
contractRestBars = {
\set Score.skipBars = ##t
}
\expandRestBars isn't particularly useful, but since we're adding
\contractRestBars I figured we might as
Hello,
Currently, there are no grace note defaults for cautionary accidentals
or scripts. Of course, these can be set as required using
add-grace-property, but I was wondering whether it might be better for
them to be set by default.
Attached is a patch to remedy this, if required.
Regards,
Neil
/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/linux-x86/build/lilypond-localhost--home-lilydev-vc
-lilypond-master/Documentation/fr/user/out-www/introduction.pdftexi:629: I can'
t find file `lily-e1fb10d024-systems.texi'.
@temp ->@input lily-e1fb10d024-systems.texi
@includezzz ...and @input #1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EM
2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:30:57 -0300
> "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Some ideas:
> >
> > - you're not using gs-load-fonts for fontloading (do you have
> > fullblown embedded fonts in your EPS files?)
>
>
> That looks like it
2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To clarify the name -- and incidentaly simply the documentation
> explanation of this bad name -- could we make the following
> change?
> \compressMusic -> \scaleDurations
Good idea.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all
Graham Percival 17 March 2008 12:09
>
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:02:43 +0100
> "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > \compressMusic -> \scaleDurations
> >
> > I liked \compressMusic -- I used to find it funny :)
> >
> >
what about \scaleTime ?
Am Monday, den 17. March 2008 um 13:51:10 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Valentin
Villenave:
> 2008/3/17, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > > Happier with \multiplyDurations?
>
> > I don't think it's clearer and not less ambiguous either, so
2008/3/17, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Happier with \multiplyDurations?
> I don't think it's clearer and not less ambiguous either, so \scaleDurations
> gets my vote.
\shrinkDurations?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
li
Greetings everyone,
sorry for the leak; I've made Reinhold's plans public on the "LilyPond
Report" last issue; however I'm confident that not enough people read
it to start a polemic right now :)
2008/3/16, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How about using two lines with left/center/rig
Graham Percival wrote:
Potentially... that's actually what prompted me to think of
Durations instead of Music.
I guess we could go for broke and use \multiplyDurations. My
first thought was to avoid \multiply since it's longer than
\compress... but Durations is much longer than Music anyway,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:02:43 +0100
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > \compressMusic -> \scaleDurations
>
> I liked \compressMusic -- I used to find it funny :)
>
> I'm fine with \scaleDurations, but isn't there any ambiguit
2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> \compressMusic -> \scaleDurations
I liked \compressMusic -- I used to find it funny :)
I'm fine with \scaleDurations, but isn't there any ambiguity with the
word "scale" as in "C Major scale"?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieben Sie:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:03:00 +0100
> > Yes, I suppose that should be possible. But if anything I'd prefer
> > "double sharp (Music Glossary)".
> > Anyway, I now found the way to remove the (lilypond-internals)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> > 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Since it's a perl script, I'm assuming it's fairly self contained.
> > Perhaps we could ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> 2008/3/17, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Since we're using the CVS version of texi2html, it will be weeks
> > before it's added to our make files. In particular, I'm not going
> > to ev
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:30:57 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some ideas:
>
> - you're not using gs-load-fonts for fontloading (do you have
> fullblown embedded fonts in your EPS files?)
That looks like it. 87 .eps files are over 1M, while the other
1481 are under 300K. I
To clarify the name -- and incidentaly simply the documentation
explanation of this bad name -- could we make the following
change?
\compressMusic -> \scaleDurations
- it applies to durations rather than music. I mean, I could
argue that \compressMusic should apply to pitches instead of
durat
20 matches
Mail list logo