Re: replacing mftrace with mf2pt1

2008-01-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> ! angle(0,0) is taken as zero. I don't get this error. Where does it come from? > can you pull the branch I mentioned, and run > > cd mf; make clean ; make > > to verify that all of the errors have been taken care of? I rebuilt lilypond completely from scratch (using current dev/mf2pt1-b

long command line during build

2008-01-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The linking command to build the lilypond binary is 10621 characters long on my GNU/Linux box. I know that this is not a general issue but I wonder whether this might cause build problems on some systems... Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:08:14 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something is still missing or misconfigured. See below. Did you compile the lilypond *binary* yourself, or did you download a binary? (ie GUB) > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lily/doc/Documentation/user$ make web This command

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:11:25 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Application Usage and have found 1.2.4. :) What does the following mean? You may build the manual ( Documentation/user/ ) without building all the input/* stuff. I have now followed the previo

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:11:25 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Application Usage and have found 1.2.4. :) > > What does the following mean? > > You may build the manual ( Documentation/user/ ) without building all > the input/* stuff. > > I have now followed the previous steps on t

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Unfortunately it's easy to accidentally send these from an unsubscribed address. Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:14:24 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm following instructions at: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/advanced-tech.txt I'm trying to build to see the re

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:17:31 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Mandereau wrote: Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any directory with docs

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:51:43 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > >> My main career was as a programmer. Given that I am concerned > >> about the time it would take to learn how someone else's code > >> works well enough to be able to help there. > >> > > >

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:17:31 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Mandereau wrote: > >> > >> Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? > >> > > > > No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any > > directory with docs) with these (mo

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
John Mandereau wrote: Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 03:06 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit : Hi Graham or anyone who knows, Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any directory with docs) with these (m

Re: replacing mftrace with mf2pt1

2008-01-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2008/1/3, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The solution is simple: increase rounding precision, this is, use > > --rounding=0.0001 > > instead of > > --rounding=0.001 > > and the error message disappears. I've update the documentation > accordingly. > @{char@:accStdbase@:211@:12.95404@:12

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2008/1/6, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have actually looked at the scheme code a bit and have learned some > > Python partly to be able to understand GNU Solfege. That knowledge > > certainly can't hurt. After years of being a Forth expert C++ was my > > language of choice so who know

Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?)

2008-01-06 Thread John Mandereau
Le vendredi 04 janvier 2008 à 09:29 +0100, Mats Bengtsson a écrit : > I guess this index page is still in a very preliminary shape. In the > final version, > I would recommend you to advertise the free text search available at LSR. After second thought, any decent PDF viewer or HTML browser also

Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?)

2008-01-06 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 15:33 +0100, Valentin Villenave a écrit : > 2008/1/6, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:46:32 +0100 > > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > verbatim quotes are often too > > > verbose... > > > That's Valentin's problem, no

Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?)

2008-01-06 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/1/6, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:46:32 +0100 > John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > verbatim quotes are often too > > verbose... > That's Valentin's problem, not yours. ;) I *am* a verbose person, so I didn't notice :) John: What do you mean by "

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have actually looked at the scheme code a bit and have learned some > Python partly to be able to understand GNU Solfege. That knowledge > certainly can't hurt. After years of being a Forth expert C++ was my > language of choice so who knows where any o

Re: building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 03:06 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit : > Hi Graham or anyone who knows, > > Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? No, but you can build/clean only stuff in Documentation/user (or any directory with docs) with these (mostly undocumented) incantat

building sections of the docs

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Hi Graham or anyone who knows, Can I build just pitches.itely portion of the doc's? If so how? TIA, Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:49:00 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graham Percival wrote: If you want to jump into the technical side of things, see "advanced-tech.txt" (or perhaps you have already done this). To get an introduction to the non-technical si

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:49:00 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > If you want to jump into the technical side of things, see > > "advanced-tech.txt" (or perhaps you have already done this). To > > get an introduction to the non-technical side of the job, I > >

Re: Leaving: replacements

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:48:35 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graham Percival wrote: An previously announced, am I gradually leaving LilyPond. This leaves a large number of tasks unfilled.ate lilypond knowledge) I would consider the job of D