Re: Texinfo 4.11 required [Re: Autotester: FAIL make -f lilypond.make LILYPOND_BRANCH=master doc-build]

2007-11-12 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 11 novembre 2007 à 10:06 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : > Here's the commit to GDP: (apparently only a few days ago, not a week) > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=67767ab0bee99d0b6148959bf45b0cd05968b605 > > I see that it didn't make its way to master:

Re: GDP: squashed noteheads in improvisation

2007-11-12 Thread Graham Percival
Sounds good to me. Could somebody make this change in master? Cheers, - Graham Mats Bengtsson wrote: In these situations, the actual notes you enter are just placeholders to be able to specify a rhythm (which is the only thing of interest in this notation). So, why would you bother to use extr

[Fwd: Re: Polyphony clarification]

2007-11-12 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Graham and other GDP workers. This discussion from lilypond-user might be useful for the updating of the learning manual. Charles Gran wrote: So \upper could be a name of a voice that could have \voiceTwo properties? That wouldn't make sense, since \voiceTwo is equivalent to \stemDown \

Re: GDP: squashed noteheads in improvisation

2007-11-12 Thread Rune Zedeler
Mats Bengtsson skrev: So, why would you bother to use extra key strokes to specify a note with an accidental? Of course you wouldn't. But as the notes are represented as notes, they transpose. So even though you do not enter an accidental, it might appear after transposition. -Rune _

Re: GDP: squashed noteheads in improvisation

2007-11-12 Thread Mats Bengtsson
In these situations, the actual notes you enter are just placeholders to be able to specify a rhythm (which is the only thing of interest in this notation). So, why would you bother to use extra key strokes to specify a note with an accidental? Having written this, I just realize one obvious such

images in info docs broken...

2007-11-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi Jonh, I noticed that images in info docs were broken, and fixed it in HEAD. Then I looked at stable/2.10 but things are a bit different there, I came accross this patch: 5cacc7b9e9cb0ce9abbb1edd677fcaeb5b3568d1, which adds symlinking but not for lily-*.png. We'd need that too. To the (incomp

Re: Texinfo 4.11 required [Re: Autotester: FAIL make -f lilypond.make LILYPOND_BRANCH=master doc-build]

2007-11-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
John Mandereau: > Hello Jan and all Lily hackers, > It seems that building docs of current master with GUB repeatedly fails > because GUB may still use an old Texinfo version (maybe 4.8). Yes, thanks. I installed texinfo-4.11, but my autobuild has not been picking that up. I'll look into it.