Re: Program Usage RFC

Graham Percival escreveu: > I think the Program Usage manual is good now. Anybody have any comments > before the translators start working on it? It's on the web now in the > 2.11.31 docs. Replace lilypondtool -> jedit in the node name. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4

Program Usage RFC

I think the Program Usage manual is good now. Anybody have any comments before the translators start working on it? It's on the web now in the 2.11.31 docs. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.o

Re: [PATCHES]: Converting header and lyrics with musicxml2ly

Reinhold Kainhofer escreveu: > Attached is the next set of patches for musicxml2ly, diffed against current > git by git-format-patch. Hi, Thanks for your patches! if you intend to work on this more, I could give you write access to the repository. It would require you to sign up for savannah

Re: doc value of regtests: none

Trevor Bača wrote: I like it; smaller (on the frontpage) is better. And the bib can certainly be shoved into an appendix (though it's a very interesting read every couple of months). Ok, updated. While we're on it, can I ask whether anyone else would like to see the program reference (NOT t

Re: list of prebuilt binaries (doc: PU section 1.1)

2007/8/31, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2007/8/31, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I came up with this list from looking at the download directory. Is > > this correct? Does mingw mean "windows"? What's the deal with MacOS / > > darwin-* ? > > Very few people go to this dir

Re: some more patches updating the German translation

Le jeudi 30 août 2007 à 17:50 +0300, Till Rettig a écrit : > > John Mandereau wrote: > > Le mardi 28 août 2007 à 22:52 +0300, Till Rettig a écrit : > > > > I don't know all the > > reasons, but there is clearly one: your patches don't include all the > > changes you made to German translations

Re: doc value of regtests: none

On 8/31/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Valentin Villenave wrote: > > 2007/8/31, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > > > > The *only* reason that the regtests are still on the main doc page is > > > that it gives us a nice set of 3 4x4 blocks of item

Re: For future 2.14 doc discussion -- increasingly realistic musical examples

On 8/30/07, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trevor Bača wrote: > > Sure, I'd be happy to. (And if winds up being too complicated, then > > that's certainly OK; just keep me in check!) > > > Go nuts. :) My only concern is the vertical space of the printed > music on the page. For th

Re: For future 2.14 doc discussion -- increasingly realisticmusical examples

Carl D. Sorensen wrote: fatText is useful when using markup fret diagrams, for keeping fret diagrams from overlapping one another in quick chord changes. Has the new skylining positioning avoided that need? The last time I tried it in 2.11, it was necessary. Agreed! There are certain

Re: list of prebuilt binaries (doc: PU section 1.1)

2007/8/31, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I came up with this list from looking at the download directory. Is > this correct? Does mingw mean "windows"? What's the deal with MacOS / > darwin-* ? Very few people go to this directory, so it's no big deal IMO if the names aren't self-expla

Re: doc value of regtests: none

Valentin Villenave wrote: 2007/8/31, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > The *only* reason that the regtests are still on the main doc page is > that it gives us a nice set of 3 4x4 blocks of items. If I wasn't so > fussy (obsessive? :) about presentation, I'd remo

Re: doc value of regtests: none

2007/8/31, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The *only* reason that the regtests are still on the main doc page is > that it gives us a nice set of 3 4x4 blocks of items. If I wasn't so > fussy (obsessive? :) about presentation, I'd remove it from that page in > an instant. ahahaha :) I won