> Attached is an attempt to implement this suggestion. It is essentially
> what I had tried before introducing the gap, except for the slightly
> larger vertical extent. I'm not sure if Han-Wen meant to make the tip
> simply enter the staffline (so that it is still covered) or protrude
> through i
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb:
> Regarding the accents, I'm a bit confused still. Why don't you simply
> plug in the existing accent symbol by setting a couple of callbacks ?
Well, we were aiming for a kind of 'calligraphic' look. That is, if
possible the lower 'leg' of the accent should be somewhat t
Hi,
When dealing with books containing many scores, one may prefer to keep
the score titling and page breaking in the book main file, instead of in
individual score files. Indeed, such directives (between-score page
breaking, titling), are of book scope rather than score scope (alternate
versions
>> The gap was an attempt to neutralize that optical effect, but
>> perhaps it doesn't quite work.
>
> The gap will simply be blackened by lower resolutions...
True. And you are probably right, it doesn't really look that good.
>> What other strategies are there?
>
> Well, as Han-Wen said: Mak
On 4/4/07, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Werner - We tried exactly that and the result was optically that
> notes in a staffspace (and that therefore connect to an adjacent
> staffline) appear a bit larger than notes on a staffline (that
> therefore do not connect to an adjacent st
> > However, is it still the case that the reference pages are produce
> > automatically by snarfing the source?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, how can we add by-hand authorial comments to the ref pages?
>
> I'm not aware of any such mechanism. If you could suggest anywhere in
> the main docs to put this c
