2007/3/22, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/3/22, Arvid Grøtting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But I just might come up with a scheme function that takes two (or
> more) voices and merges (or centers) the rests that are common. Do
> you think that's feasible?
Good point there: you'll probab
I like the agile programming or extreme programming model that you
work on the items at the top of the list, and don't worry about the
items near the bottom of the list.
The low priority items will be fixed when all the items above them are
finished. It is probably a waste of time to precise prio
FYI: There are vague chances, that in 2008 I will be able to schedule a
little bit more of my time for lilypond again. ;-)
Greetings,
Juergen
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Graham Percival wrote:
About six months ago, there was discussion about a priority level below
"low"; at the time I argued again
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 07:39, Graham Percival wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> > Here is an update to the documentation on vertical spacing. I've removed
> > the section on two-pass spacing and replaced it with a couple of
> > paragraphs on how to tweak the one-pass spacing (it's rather less
> > comp
