On 2/4/07, Maximilian Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
motivated by Orm's proposal to make arrowed accidental glyphs available,
I have started a few experiments with the feta mf-sources. They seem to
be quite promising, and I think that we will soon be able to provide the
"arrowed"
Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> Wow, that was both very fast and very helpful. Thanks a lot, Han-Wen!
>
>> I think it's best if all arrowheads have the same size.
>
> That was my plan anyway. This is all still very experimental.
>
>> Also, the brushed stem with the arrowed flat looks awkward. I'd
Wow, that was both very fast and very helpful. Thanks a lot, Han-Wen!
> I think it's best if all arrowheads have the same size.
That was my plan anyway. This is all still very experimental.
> Also, the brushed stem with the arrowed flat looks awkward. I'd also
> try making it straight.
Even if
Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> For purposes of illustration, I attached a small example of the glyphs
> in (one of) their current preliminary shape(s). Please note that the
> arrowheads of the flat signs are larger (resp. smaller when pointing
> down) than those of the sharp signs because their size
Hi everyone,
motivated by Orm's proposal to make arrowed accidental glyphs available,
I have started a few experiments with the feta mf-sources. They seem to
be quite promising, and I think that we will soon be able to provide the
"arrowed" style as an alternative -- for a suitable meaning of "soo
Quoting Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi dev, Hi Graham,
Maybe snarfing convert-ly rules (the textual descriptions, anyway) and
adding to the web docs somewhere would be helpful. (Or maybe this
already exists somewhere and I've never noticed!)
(I know convert-ly takes care of this, but lots
On 2/4/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/4/07, Ole Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> When I try to use convert-ly via the terminal (I am using Mac OS X
> 10.4.8)
> or via Lilypond / Compile-menu/ Update syntax, I get the following
> error message:
> ---
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Till Rettig wrote:
Juergen Reuter wrote:
Hi, Till!
My personal experience is that you have to fine tune the glyphs anyway;
hence, determining just a few coordinates should suffice (this can be
easily done manually if you have a really big printout of the scan).
Do you
