Merry Christmas everybody (with a LilyPond score)

2006-12-24 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, I wish you all a merry christmas, and I thought I'll give you a gift: the score for "Silent Night": -- snip -- \header { title = "Silent Night" } \score { R1*16 } -- snap -- Ciao, Dscho ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-

Help with git and LilyPond Tutorial

2006-12-24 Thread Daniel Tonda
Greetings: Francisco and I, AFAIK are working in the spanish translation. I don't know how to use git to get the tutorial and start working in it. I already used git to download the web site to my computer, and used the commands on the http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob_plain;f

Re: new tag for `status' field in bug database

2006-12-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Werner LEMBERG escreveu: >>> I suggest to add a new value `postponed' to the `status' field in >>> the bug database. For example, bug #14 deserves this tag IMHO. >> I'm not sure this is necessary. In some ways, any bug that's more >> than two weeks old is "postponed". > > I don't think so. Othe

Re: new tag for `status' field in bug database

2006-12-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > I suggest to add a new value `postponed' to the `status' field in > > the bug database. For example, bug #14 deserves this tag IMHO. > > I'm not sure this is necessary. In some ways, any bug that's more > than two weeks old is "postponed". I don't think so. Other bug databases like bugzill

Re: new tag for `status' field in bug database

2006-12-24 Thread Graham Percival
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I suggest to add a new value `postponed' to the `status' field in the bug database. For example, bug #14 deserves this tag IMHO. I'm not sure this is necessary. In some ways, any bug that's more than two weeks old is "postponed". Besides, isn't the "priority" field su

Re: Fwd: doc addition re. font sizes

2006-12-24 Thread Graham Percival
Eyolf Ostrem wrote: On Thu 21 December 2006 08:56, Mats Bengtsson wrote: See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-12/msg00351.html for example. Yes, that's an important bit of information to add; I cursed quite a lot before I figured that one out... http://lilypond.org/web/

Re: Re-write of documentation tree build process

2006-12-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just done. I've spent so much time testing and debugging that I think > stable/2.10 is almost ready for a Christmas release :-) Thanks. > Ok. But I've scrapped remove_self_ref() because no HTML file in the docs > currently needs it. @WEB-TITLE@ substi