\column and baseline-skip

Currently, it's *very* tedious to get various baseline-skip values -- in define-markup-commands.scm there is a small, innocent comment: ;; TODO: should extract baseline-skip from each argument somehow.. It took me a long time to find out how to get vertical spacing like this:

Re: patch for properly scaled fractions

> Note that the correct command to position the plus sign is > \translate-scaled; this is something which should probably be added > to the documentation. > > However, it's still not perfect yet: For smaller sizes, the > whitespace surrounding the plus sign is too large since it isn't > scaled. I

Re: urgent: layout of first page

> You'd rather have to modify the function that computes the first > system position on page: `first-line-position' in the file > scm/layout-page-layout.scm Thanks, I came to the same conclusion (but without doing any programming). > (define (first-line-position line layout) > "Position of the

Re: urgent: layout of first page

Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Independently of this, I think it is another error that > `head-separation' and `page-top-space' are applied on the first page > if a title is present. > > To circumvent this I would like to say > > page-top-space = > #(if (not-first-page) >

patch for properly scaled fractions

I suggest the patch at the end of this email to get properly scaled fractions. The two images demonstrate this, using the input below. Note that the correct command to position the plus sign is \translate-scaled; this is something which should probably be added to the documentation. However, it'

Re: skyline vertical spacing

Joe Neeman escreveu: > On 11/28/06, *Werner LEMBERG* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > Joe, > > > here's a quite important problem regarding skyline positioning and > outside-staff-priority. Hopefully, you can fix that easily since this > feature ro

Re: skyline vertical spacing

> What happens if you make the c'' higher? Both `A' and `B' are moved up, aligned horizontally. > (Also, the skyline spacing currently only raises an object just > enough to avoid collisions, there isn't (yet) a way to introduce > extra padding between objects) I've noticed this already :-)

Re: skyline vertical spacing

On 11/28/06, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe, here's a quite important problem regarding skyline positioning and outside-staff-priority. Hopefully, you can fix that easily since this feature rocks! What happens if you make the c'' higher? I should mention that the skyline ve

Re: skyline vertical spacing

Joe, here's a quite important problem regarding skyline positioning and outside-staff-priority. Hopefully, you can fix that easily since this feature rocks! Werner == \version "2.11.0" \header { texidoc = " Rehears