Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Johannes Schindelin escreveu: Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I have some more clues now; some of the time stamps in the CVS repo are messed up; eg revision 1.2 of flower/include/GNUmakefile lists 2002 as the year which is clearly wrong. Most definitely this would trigger a

Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I have some more clues now; some of the time stamps in the CVS repo are > messed up; eg revision 1.2 of flower/include/GNUmakefile lists 2002 as > the year which is clearly wrong. Most definitely this would trigger a "bug" in cvsps. I say "bug

Re: Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Johannes Schindelin escreveu: Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Interested parties can get the darcs repo at http://lilypond.org/~hanwen/gub-git/ Well, I cannot. As I stated earlier, I gave up on darcs. You can simply wget the directory, which will give you a runnable

Re: lilypond on FreeBSD?

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Ian Stirling escreveu: Compiling 2.9.26 fails with the following.. cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors polynomial.cc: In member function 'void Polynomial::check_sol(Real) const': polynomial.cc:170: warning: empty body in an if-statement thanks, fixed. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROT

Small doc updates

2006-10-22 Thread Juergen Reuter
Hi, Graham! I had to make small updates to some of the ancient notation examples in the docs to make them better reflect the current implementation. Accordingly, I also updated tiny parts of the text refering to these examples. I hope, that's ok? Of course, feel free to change my changes!

Re: [Bug?] Dotting notes by music function

2006-10-22 Thread Juergen Reuter
FYI: After looking once more through a couple of files in the scm directory, I finally found the shift-duration-log function that exactly does what I wanted. For the moment, I take this one. Thanks again, Juergen On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Juergen Reuter wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Nicolas Sceaux

Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Johannes Schindelin escreveu: I am tracking the current lilypond repository with git. I could donate this git repository (it is ca. 60MB at the moment). I prefer git over the other alternatives: it is blazingly fast, *very* portable (I gave up on porting darcs after a fruitless day), and br

Re: lilypond on FreeBSD?

2006-10-22 Thread Ian Stirling
On Saturday 21 October 2006 03:55, you wrote: > Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I haven't managed to make Lilypond work on my > > FreeBSD 6.1 system. The precompiled version gives > > a runtime error looking for a non existent library. > > What library is that? /usr/libexec/ld-

Git repository, was Re: doc branching

2006-10-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Interested parties can get the darcs repo at > http://lilypond.org/~hanwen/gub-git/ Well, I cannot. As I stated earlier, I gave up on darcs. > however, I seem to have some trouble with importing the CVS repo into > Git. My attempt is at >

Re: newweb ChangeLog site/news.ihtml site/about/pub...

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Joe Neeman escreveu: +Music streams thess available - October 21, 2006 thess? ^^ Yours, The typo police fixed. The typo police is welcome to become the typo correctional facility, btw. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond

Re: newweb ChangeLog site/news.ihtml site/about/pub...

2006-10-22 Thread Joe Neeman
> +Music streams thess available - October 21, 2006 thess? ^^ > + > + > +The last months, Erik Sandberg has been overhauling the internals of > +Lily. This change introduces a new intermediate format, Music Streams, > +which will make it easier get music data out of LilyPond.

Re: pure simple-closures

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Joe Neeman escreveu: On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Joe Neeman schreef: On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Joe Neeman schreef: Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to handle arbitrary length argument lists i

Re: pure simple-closures

2006-10-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Joe Neeman escreveu: On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Joe Neeman schreef: On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Joe Neeman schreef: Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to handle arbitrary length argument lists i

Re: Patch proposal: DocBook support for lilypond-book

2006-10-22 Thread lilypondtool
>> Should I create a patch? Against which version? Any suggestions? > > Can you also add a relevant section to the manual? Thanks! I've updated the lilypond-book.itely. Attached. Sorry I have not created a patch, I don't have access now to any computer with diff utils. lilypond-book-docbook.itely

Re: pure simple-closures

2006-10-22 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Joe Neeman schreef: > > On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > >> Joe Neeman schreef: > >> > >>> Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to > >>> handle arbitrary length argument lists i