[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last patch of this release:
2006-07-12 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Documentation/user/SConscript, make/lilypond-vars.make,
input/GNUmakefile: doc build looks in input/manual instead
of input/test/
* input/manual/ GNUmakefile,
Hi, y'all --
Paul wrote:
In my experience upbeat is the second half of a beat where downbeat
is the first half of a beat.
If it needs to be changed "pickup(s)" at least means what you seem
to be referring to.
For the record, "upbeat" and "pickup" are generally considered
synonymous -- se
Hello--
I would be happy to sponsor the work on several issues that Werner
Lemberg reported to bug-lilypond last month (in June, 2006), if those
issues have not already been addressed.
Specifically the issues I refer to are related to ties and are mentioned
in the following archived bug-lilypond
Graham Percival wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
In an ideal world we wouldn't need workarounds like this, but it's
useful to have a "fudge factor" \partial. Perhaps we could rename it,
and hide it somewhere in the manual un
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
In an ideal world we wouldn't need workarounds like this, but it's
useful to have a "fudge factor" \partial. Perhaps we could rename it,
and hide it somewhere in the manual under "advanced tweaks"?
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival schreef:
1) Should we keep input/test/*.ly files that are used in the manual
as separate files?
no, not necessarily, but be careful, some files might be used more than
once.
I'll do it in two stages: first I'll move snippets from test/ to manual/
,
Erik Sandberg schreef:
May I commit if make web succeeds?
Please wait until 2.9.11 is released.
>
> Plan for the next steps:
> I'll take a bunch of engravers at a time, and convert them. I'll
probably
> proceed alphabetically or something, and perhaps send one patch for
every 10
> translat
Look at the attached example, I'm using modern cautionary accidentals
Why is the cautionary accidental on the last note, and not on the previous
one?
This doesn't happen if you delete the first note.
sorry if the bug was solved after 2.8.0
% Lily was here -- automatically converted by /usr/bin/
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:59, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > On Monday 10 July 2006 13:42, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >> On 7/10/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + Implement the method cl::listen_##m, and make it listen to stream
> > + events of cla
Erik Sandberg schreef:
On Monday 10 July 2006 13:42, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On 7/10/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Sandberg schreef:
Use C++ names in C++, and scheme names in scheme, i.e.
Foo_bar::bla_bla
for handling a bla-bla-event.
so do you also think that all str
Graham Percival schreef:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Would it be possible to reduce the traffic on the list? For example,
could we run the reports through bzip2, or place the lengthy parts of
reports on the web instead of inside email bodies?
Seconded. Or perhaps only sending the summary messages t
On 7/12/06, Mathieu Giraud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/6/06, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has
> musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last
> bar of a piece or of a major section of a pi
On 7/6/06, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has
musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last
bar of a piece or of a major section of a piece (typically the bar before
the next "||" bar glyph) shoul
13 matches
Mail list logo
