Re: Can only commit ChangeLog

Please disregard. The problem was that CVS/lily/Root still listed the anoncvs server. On Tue, 9 May 2006 08:11, Joe Neeman wrote: > I'm probably just being retarded with CVS, but: > > $ cvs ci > # only wants to commit the changelog > > $ cvs ci lily/bar-engraver.cc lily/beam-engraver.cc > # wants

Can only commit ChangeLog

I'm probably just being retarded with CVS, but: $ cvs ci # only wants to commit the changelog $ cvs ci lily/bar-engraver.cc lily/beam-engraver.cc # wants to commit both files $ cvs ci lily/bar-engraver.cc lily/beam-engraver.cc ChangeLog # only wants to commit the ChangeLog I've also tried all c

Re: penalty -> permission patch

Joe Neeman wrote: OK, here's another try (and I made web successfully). Thanks, looks good. Please apply. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___

Re: penalty -> permission patch

OK, here's another try (and I made web successfully). 2006-05-08 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * scm/define-context-properties.scm: * scm/define-grob-properties.scm: * scm/define-grobs.scm: * scm/define-music-display-methods.scm: * scm/define-music-prop

Re: Transformation experiments

Erlend Aasland wrote: There are no bugs with the current code, so why rewrite it? Because it's not _obviously_ correct. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com

Re: Transformation experiments

On 5/8/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok, nits that need to be addressed before integrating:  - stencil::rotate should take Offset() as argument.Done   - I think widen() can also shrink the bbox, can you double check thatyour scaling routine doesn't shrink the bbox?  (x_new - x_le

Re: Transformation experiments

Erlend Aasland wrote: On 5/5/06, *Han-Wen Nienhuys* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > ... the problem is more about what variables to modify. It > appears to me like dim_ contains the bounding box, but when I modify it, > the rotated stencils are misplac

Re: penalty -> permission patch

Joe Neeman wrote: I think it would be better to get rid of this double use, and have a 'line-break-permission which should be in spaceable-grob or perhaps paper-column, and is controlled with BreakEvents, while there also is a 'non-musical property, part of item-interface. (a better name for non

Re: bug emails

On Friday 05 May 2006 11:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > Erik stopped including submitter's emails in the bug CVS to avoid them > > getting spammed; he simply kept a mailbox of bug emails, and when an > > has this been a real problem or a preemptive strike? I wonder whethe

Re: Transformation experiments

On 5/5/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... the problem is more about what variables to modify. It> appears to me like dim_ contains the bounding box, but when I modify it,> the rotated stencils are misplaced.strange. are you sure you're not seeing artefacts of the fact that placem

Re: penalty -> permission patch

On Mon, 8 May 2006 04:07, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > there's a bit of confusion with the breakable property, because it both > signals whether or not items are on nonmusical Paper_columns (see eg. > the use of Item::is_breakable in separating-line-group-engraver.cc) and > to signal whether a nonmu