Will 2.8 GUB be compiled with -march=pentiumpro?
Thanks,
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Arno Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> dear list,
>>
>> for a contemporary music score i need hairpin having a circles around
>> their tip, indicating cresc./descresc. from/into silence.
>>
>> what is the
I would like to have \partcombine (or a similar command) handle three
voices. How difficult is this? The code in part-combiner.scm looks
quite symmetric, but my Scheme knowledge is too limited to extend it
by myself...
Nicolas? Han-Wen?
Werner
__
Quoting Marco Gusy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, I would like to hear what you think about lilypond and beaming in vocal
music.
I'm quite sure it's common in traditional engraving to beam together only
notes of a melisma. The rule is: two syllabes never are beamed together. I
attach a picture as an e
Hi, I would like to hear what you think about lilypond and beaming in vocal
music.
I'm quite sure it's common in traditional engraving to beam together only
notes of a melisma. The rule is: two syllabes never are beamed together. I
attach a picture as an example. This is Bach Magnificat, the "M
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Saturday 11 March 2006 00.11, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Hello!
I've just finished lilypond 2.7.38. This is likely to be the last
release candidate before we release 2.8, so report any bugs that you
might find.
As the bug meister, it's my obligation to pester you about
dear list,
for a contemporary music score i need hairpin having a circles around
their tip, indicating cresc./descresc. from/into silence.
what is the easiest way to enter these into the score? or does this need
to be implemented yet? i did not find that mentioned in the docs.
thanks, arn
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Exactly this is the problem! This is *bad* for stems without beams.
I've just looked into various scores (Mozart Urtext, Bärenreiter,
Bruckner, complete works, etc.), and not a single one shows this
behaviour. Please revert the default.
OK. Point taken; I did notice this
Graham Percival wrote:
... although perhaps renamed to \context -- in fact, remove the \layout
entirely:
(toplevel)
\context {
\Staff {
\override blah
}
\Voice {
\override foo
}}
I think it would be better to make the syntax analogous to what we have
for music, eg.
\context
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It's *very* useful to have `global' values and `local' ones which
override within a block. What about using \paper both globally and
locally, similar to TeX?
No, this will confuse people, since then
\score { \paper { #(set-paper-size "a4") }}
won't work.
--
Han-Wen
10 matches
Mail list logo