Graham Percival wrote:
Devel: given that it doesn't seem that we can fix TeX's broken
interpretation of
"verbatim", I think that this would be worth addressing this in
lilypond's parser. I know
it sucks to add a special case just for this, but people can reasonably
expect
to be able to cut a
Wiz Aus wrote:
Getting you up and running in your personal favorite environment is
something Jan and I could do. However it would take us a lot of time,
a resource which is very precious for us, and it doesn't buy us
anything. Therefore, we don't feel like doing it.
But that's not what I'm as
On 12-Oct-05, at 2:45 AM, A. Deubelbeiss wrote:
When Lilypond encounters the ’ character, the program aborts without
mentioning the fact in the .log file. (Note that the Windows versions
don't have a console open at that point; other platforms may get an
error message there for all I know.) T
Some time ago, we noticed that after branching, the first patch to a
file
resulted in the whole file being sent as a diff on the cvs email list.
I recently
got this reply on the issue.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Derek Robert Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 12, 2005 6:37:07 AM
The subject says all, I get this:
midi-item.cc: In member function `virtual const char* Midi_item::name() const':
midi-item.cc:476: error: `class_name' undeclared (first use this function)
midi-item.cc:476: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears
Wiz Aus wrote:
environment they do. For a start, if we are truly concerned about
ensuring the longevity of our code, then tieing yourself intricably to
"our" code? What did you contribute, then?
This discussion is not going anywhere, so let me try to summarize my
point of view as bluntly an
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wiz Aus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Illegal C++
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:14:44 +0200
Freedom and esp. ownership of your own data, those might be themes
that interest you given that you choose Wi
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wiz Aus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Illegal C++
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:55:40 -0700
"Wiz Aus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> miss the many admittedly powerful tools that are available under
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wiz Aus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Illegal C++
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:35:56 +0200
I guess what frustrates me most about GNU-style developing is that so much
effort is put into neat configure s
Milan Zamazal wrote:
"NS" == Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NS> Using in Emacs 22.0.50.1, I applied the following patch.
The following additional patch seems to be needed to avoid an error in
post-command-hook:
-
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
even if I liked linux as an OS better than Windows overall
(which I don't - they both have their merits and their weaknesses),
Most people I know chose GNU/linux not for technical reasons but
because of the freedom.
I would still choose to work under Windows because
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hrmmph. Is this still an mftrace problem (does mftrace cmr10 produce a
.pfa which looks good in fontforge?)
Alas, no. I get no glyphs, and the output of mftrace is as follows.
BTW, there is presumably a missing "\n" o
Wiz Aus writes:
> even if I liked linux as an OS better than Windows overall
> (which I don't - they both have their merits and their weaknesses),
Most people I know chose GNU/linux not for technical reasons but
because of the freedom.
> I would still choose to work under Windows because
Freedo
13 matches
Mail list logo
