Re: cannot build lilypond 2.6.3 on powerpc

2005-10-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hrmmph. Is this still an mftrace problem (does mftrace cmr10 produce a > .pfa which looks good in fontforge?) Alas, no. I get no glyphs, and the output of mftrace is as follows. BTW, there is presumably a missing "\n" on one of these printfs. Tho

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Wiz Aus wrote: All I would suggest is that there was at least one webpage somewhere that just had the links to the correct versions of everything required to build and compile lilypond under Mingw, along with whatever installation instructions are necessary. We have a wiki, you're welcome to co

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Thursday 13 October 2005 10.50, Wiz Aus wrote: > >We've come a long way to get LilyPond compiled for windows. > >Currently, it can be cross compiled to cygwin and to mingw. That took > >quite some time and effort, but I'm quite pleased with the result. > >There is no reason to build or develop

Re: cannot build lilypond 2.6.3 on powerpc

2005-10-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I'm using mftrace version 1.1.12, and potrace version 1.7. Autotrace version 0.31.1 is also installed, but mftrace says it uses potrace if both are there. mftrace also uses t1asm, which is ve

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Wiz Aus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > miss the many admittedly powerful tools that are available under linux. > But never yet have I felt the slightly bit compelled to choose to develop > under that platform. I'm sorry, but I like my GUI's, and my single > keystroke > compile and debug cycles,

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Wiz Aus wrote: > Now, do I really need to download every single one of those packages > individually? And are they all available in the right versions for mingw? > You should be able to compile everything except python using mingw. Python requires some extreme hackery to get going. There are t

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wiz Aus writes: > >> I'm sorry, but I like my GUI's, and my single keystroke compile and >> debug cycles, and not to having to worry about which version of >> which package is compatible with another and why this scripting >> command works here and n

Re: Lilypond and Emacs mode for Emacs 22

2005-10-13 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "NS" == Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NS> Using in Emacs 22.0.50.1, I applied the following patch. The following additional patch seems to be needed to avoid an error in post-command-hook: --- lilypond0/lilypond-font-lock.el 2005-10-13 11:12:36.0 +0200 +++ lilypond

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Wiz Aus
We've come a long way to get LilyPond compiled for windows. Currently, it can be cross compiled to cygwin and to mingw. That took quite some time and effort, but I'm quite pleased with the result. There is no reason to build or develop [free software] on Windows, when we have GNU/Linux at our co

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Wiz Aus
From: Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Wiz Aus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Illegal C++ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:10:36 +0200 On 10/13/05, Wiz Aus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now, do I really need to download every single one of those pac

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Wiz Aus
From: Daniel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Wiz Aus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Illegal C++ Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:12:40 -0700 Wiz Aus wrote: >> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Wiz Aus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lily-devel >> Subject: Re: Illegal C+

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Wiz Aus wrote: Perhaps you could try [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? You seem to get off topic... Off topic how? I'm trying to get lilypond to build. Surely others that have done so successfully Problem: there is noone besides Jan that did so. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Wiz Aus writes: > I'm sorry, but I like my GUI's, and my single keystroke compile and > debug cycles, and not to having to worry about which version of > which package is compatible with another and why this scripting > command works here and not there. Ah, if only Linux had a GUI! And single ke

Re: Illegal C++

2005-10-13 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Wiz Aus writes: > So why can't it be built under Windows just using MinGW (and not cygwin)? Of course it can be done, you've got all the source. It's just that it hasn't been done yet, so you may need to fix configure/build systems and patch some packages. We've come a long way to get LilyPond