Re: better beam direction algorithm (again)

> > Lilypond still uses a non-optimal beam direction algorithm. Again > > I suggest to simply check for the note under the beam which has > > the greatest distance from the staff's middle line, and to use its > > natural direction for the whole beam. > > But what happens if there are a lot of tho

Re: Ritardandi and Accelerandi for MIDI

Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Michael Welsh Duggan wrote: >>> My only problem with this is the following: It doesn't appear to >>> allow a crescendo to happen throught a single note without some extra >>> hackery added. It wo

Re: docs

On 30-Aug-05, at 3:38 AM, Hans de Rijck wrote: Please add to index: \afterGrace Done. \stemUp \stemDown I'm not certain about these. I commented out the section on setting stem directions, since that section isn't useful. I suppose I could include that info in the section on polyphon

Re: Resource list: wiki started

Graham Percival wrote: > On 19-Aug-05, at 10:33 AM, John Mandereau wrote: > > > http://wikihost.org/wikis/lilypond/ > > My one concern is the "tips and tricks"; I think that should be a link > to the LSR. I've fixed it. > I don't think that we have enough users to support multiple > wikis (and

Re: docs

On 8/30/05, Hans de Rijck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Some small remarks about the documentation (both html and pdf) for version > 2.6. > 6.5.3 Dynamics > Please add a line how to get dynamics aligned. It's now very implicit. > What I mean is, your example > c\< c\! d\> e\! > leads

Re: autopackage installer - missing dependency

Ferenc Wagner writes: > Yes: > $ package -v > autopackage 1.0.2, (c) 2002-2005 the autopackage developers Aw, crap. I wish they would fix that: using old buggy versions when new, fixed version is included. > So I created a fresh user and executed the above file under > that. There the installa

Re: version number question

On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09.27, David Bobroff wrote: > In the current CVS directory it says: > > (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 > > When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened > when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was > version 2.7.

docs

Hi, Some small remarks about the documentation (both html and pdf) for version 2.6. Please add to index: \afterGrace \stemUp \stemDown 6.5.1 Articulations In the chart showing all scripts available, can there be some spacing between the words, they are now almost impossible to decipher, for ex

Re: better beam direction algorithm (again)

Werner LEMBERG wrote: [CVS 2005-08-28] Lilypond still uses a non-optimal beam direction algorithm. Again I suggest to simply check for the note under the beam which has the greatest distance from the staff's middle line, and to use its natural direction for the whole beam. hmm. But what happe

Re: Ritardandi and Accelerandi for MIDI

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Welsh Duggan wrote: >> My only problem with this is the following: It doesn't appear to >> allow a crescendo to happen throught a single note without some extra >> hackery added. It would be better (IMHO) if we could emit >> Audio_dynamic ev

Re: cvs commit error

Thanks, it's ok now. Gauvain --- Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > See, for example, > > http://www.tigris.org/nonav/scdocs/ddCVS_cvscontributing.html#cvsresolving > > Greetings, > Juergen > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Pocentek Gauvain wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've just com

better beam direction algorithm (again)

[CVS 2005-08-28] Lilypond still uses a non-optimal beam direction algorithm. Again I suggest to simply check for the note under the beam which has the greatest distance from the staff's middle line, and to use its natural direction for the whole beam. Werner =

Re: cvs commit error

See, for example, http://www.tigris.org/nonav/scdocs/ddCVS_cvscontributing.html#cvsresolving Greetings, Juergen On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Pocentek Gauvain wrote: Hi, I've just committed updated french files and get this: cvs server: file `po/newweb.pot' had a conflict and has not been modifie

cvs commit error

Hi, I've just committed updated french files and get this: cvs server: file `po/newweb.pot' had a conflict and has not been modified cvs [server aborted]: correct above errors first! I absolutly don't know what is to be done. Gauvain ___

Re: Ritardandi and Accelerandi for MIDI

Michael Welsh Duggan wrote: My only problem with this is the following: It doesn't appear to allow a crescendo to happen throught a single note without some extra hackery added. It would be better (IMHO) if we could emit Audio_dynamic events (or Audio_tempo events) at discrete quantum intervals

Re: version number question

On 30-Aug-05, at 12:27 AM, David Bobroff wrote: In the current CVS directory it says: (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was version 2.7.8. Yes --

version number question

In the current CVS directory it says: (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was version 2.7.8. While this probably isn't a real problem it looks odd to me.