What I am saying is I am intrigued and impressed by the statement:
Lilypond serves as a formal definition of a music document.
I think this is a good goal and I serious when I say it is a superior goal
to the goal of making Lilypond useful. That goal is too broad and invites
the question 'Useful
Currently Metronome Marks is section number 8.3.1>
Yes, but I am looking at the documentation currently online. It is just an
example, I not trying to point out a problem that you have already solved
Do you have any specific examples of un-lean format?>
I am quoting from the documentation. I can'
Stephen wrote:
I think my main gripe is that there may be a trend towards catering to
the requests of the user. Ideally, Lilypond should be made incapable of
producing bad output. That means limiting the options and choices given
to the user.
I disagree with your reasoning, but that is besides t
I think my main gripe is that there may be a trend towards catering to the
requests of the user. Ideally, Lilypond should be made incapable of
producing bad output. That means limiting the options and choices given to
the user.
Usually I applaud when a developer responds to a user. But some use
Op 19-mei-05 om 20:19 heeft Graham Percival het volgende geschreven:
Changelog-2.1:
2003-09-27 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* scripts/lilypond.py (escape_path): escape quotes too.
* Documentation/user/lilypond.tely (Unified index): rename
Index
to accomodate Windo
Changelog-2.1:
2003-09-27 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* scripts/lilypond.py (escape_path): escape quotes too.
* Documentation/user/lilypond.tely (Unified index): rename Index
to accomodate Windows breakage.
Can anybody remember why "Index" produces breakage on Win
Graham Percival wrote:
For instance, in 5.7.4 Metronome marks, 'See also' points to
MetronomeChangeEvent. Why not replace that with MetronomeMark? In the
MetronomeChangeEvent page, I click on Metronome_mark_engraver and from
there MetronomeMark.
Currently Metronome Marks is section number 8.3.1
Stephen wrote:
I wonder if all the developers are still on board with the goal of
keeping the format 'as lean as possible'?
>
written, but still we have 'condensed' and 'lean' as words defining the
purpose and goal of writing Lilypond and for Lilypond. My take on it is
anyone who joins these two
On 19-May-05, at 7:48 AM, Stephen wrote:
For instance, in 5.7.4 Metronome marks, 'See also' points to
MetronomeChangeEvent. Why not replace that with MetronomeMark? In the
MetronomeChangeEvent page, I click on Metronome_mark_engraver and from
there MetronomeMark.
Currently Metronome Marks is sec
Graham,
That was my thought exactly, except instead of saying 'get rid of' I would
have said 'replace'.
For instance, in 5.7.4 Metronome marks, 'See also' points to
MetronomeChangeEvent. Why not replace that with MetronomeMark? In the
MetronomeChangeEvent page, I click on Metronome_mark_engrave
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not
of much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email
addresses everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and
worm-mail (your address is broad
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not of
much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email addresses
everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and worm-mail (your
address is broadcast via the mailinglist
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Removing the ChangeLog might be a good idea anyway, since it is not of
much use for users. However, I oppose to scrambling email addresses
everywhere. It doesn't solve the problem of spam and worm-mail (your
address is broadcast via the mailinglist to virus-infested plat
On 18-May-05, at 8:23 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
By the way, why is the index entitled "Unified Index"?
I have never seen this formulation used anywhere else
and from the email list, I have got the impression that
many people have never realized that the manual has an
index. I propose to rename it s
Juergen Reuter wrote:
... I would like to ask if the e-Mail addresses in the ChangeLog could
be either encrypted or replaced by e.g. http addresses.
From carefully analyzing some of the countless spam mails and delivery
failure notification mails, it looks like as if the ChangeLog file is
one o
15 matches
Mail list logo
